Vote for "Scooby-Doo" as the worst children's movie featuring a live action/CGI mix in the FilmVerse Summer '12 Theatre of Shame contest.
http://filmverse.com/2012/08/20/filmverse-summer-12-theatre-of-shame/
This movie spawned a sequel, and doing so might be considered an automatic exemption from a "worst movie" designation.
____________________
Terrible movies can't have sequels?
shareA movie can be "terrible" in a certain sense. If it appeals to a large enough audience, then it at least is not categorically unwatchable.
Also, many people thought the sequel was better, therefore the original could be said to have potential, and minor flaws that are easily correctible. A "worst" kind of movie would not even have those qualities, otherwise you'd be weakening the meaning of "worst".
____________________
It wasn't horrible at all. Parts were actually brilliant, hence its big success. It was a good mix of tribute and satire like The Brady Bunch Movie.
share