Those aren't so much clues as they are poor excuses.
Those points aren't reason enough to conclude that Fenton is a demon. They are signs of what we are going to be shown by the end of the movie: Fenton implies that he knows himself to be a demon (which I suppose you could chalk up to delusion induced by his crazy father), and Adam seems to actually be under supernatural protection (the video tape is obscured, and an FBI agent who has met him before looks him in the face and doesn't recognize him).
It is unsettling to think that anyone would use such thin evidence as the OP gave to conclude that an actual person were a demon, but I don't think that argument was made.
I know it's just a film and all, but this is the sort of logic that really does lead fanatical believers to dehumanize (or demonize) others for totally innocuous things (such as not wanting to sing a song, or not claiming to be part of some special chosen group that talks to angels and has "visions").
I can understand you not wanting to get past your distaste, in that this movie does get pretty close to portraying the actual worldview of religious fanatics. If you can emotionally distance a bit, and consider the possibility that the movie doesn't do much to legitimize that kind of thinking, it is quite an interesting movie. We are presented with what appears to be a psychotic man in a realistic world dragging his children into a killing spree, but it turns out the world he lives in is a fanatic's fantasy. A horrifying twist on the "is he crazy or not?" trope.
I think we're stuck with delusional psychotics and religious fanatics who mean to do us harm, and I don't think the movie will make the problem worse. But it's okay if people are disgusted by what the movie is doing.
reply
share