I'm no musician, but I also noticed that Szpilman started out rusty. He got progressively better as he got into playing.
No. This statement is inaccurate.
HE does start out rusty, as anyone would after such a long time away, but it is a little like riding a bicycle. The finger memory is still there.
No and yes (more no than yes, though).
1. He didn't "start out rusty". That's exactly the way how the piece meant to be played, very soft and slow tempo in the beginning, and then it progresses and picks up pace in the end.
You can listen and compare to both versions (the movie and a normal-concert version) and you'll see they sound the same (apart from the edits the movie made to it)
Movie version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHfQCfUTlXEConcert version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW5po_Z7YEs(the movie plays from 0:00 to 3:20, then cuts to some random parts in the middle, then plays to 8:20 till the end)
2. In reality Szpillman played the much easier Chopin Nocturne Op.48 No.1 in C Minor, which is probably a better choice after not playing for so long. You can listen at it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=107Iwx5RKSMI'm a pianist myself, not concert level, but I'm able to play the Nocturne quite well. The Ballade is way more difficult and I have a lot of trouble playing it exactly as it should be; I can play the beginning up to the mid-part, but the ending is a bit hard.
Regarding the long period of time with no playing, indeed finger memory is still there, but I guess it depends on the talent and skills of the person. Speaking for myself, if I spent so much time without playing, I would definetily not be able to play the ballade.
I also don't understand why they went with the ballade for the movie rather than the original nocturne. I think the nocturne would have captured the same essence, would have been a bit more believable of being able to play it after so long, and would have made a better point.
reply
share