Guys:
Remember, this whole point was even MENTIONED in the movie itself. Remember the scene, where Anne comes to Otto after a nightmare?
Anne is, understandably, extremely upset and claims she hates the Germans, that they won't stop until they've killed all the Jews. Otto stops her and tells her that she should never say that, there are good and bad people everywhere, no matter where they come from. He points out that Gies and Kraler (I believe) are Austrian just like Hitler, and asks her if she wants them to be dead. She says no, and he proceeds to point out that they are German. Anne denies this, and Margot backs her up.
But, despite this, there is a clear indication that they were trying to point out that not all Germans were bad.
There's even a moment where they are all waiting for the list of who was to be transported from Westerbork. Pfeffer is freaking out, telling Otto he must be able to do something, that they have to stay off the list. Otto tells him that "there's not a string in this camp I haven't tried to pull", saying that the only thing the listmakers would understand is bartering, and they have nothing to trade, and that he's not sure it'd do any good even if they did. This is when Hermann Van Pels claim the listmakers are as bad as the Nazis, saving their own skins. Otto shuts him up by saying "And in their place, you'd do something different."
Anne herself isn't portrayed as perfect here - there is a definite difference in the almost-saintly portrayal in earlier versions of Anne Frank movies.
In other words, tldr, the move isn't attempting to blame an entire group of people - except the Nazis themselves who were involved.
reply
share