Costuming Question


At the ladies "society" event. Why are all of the ladies wearing white or light dresses, but red "sleeves". Is it meant to show that they are all somewhat alike and Becky is the outsider?

reply

Were they sleeves or stoles?
I wondered about that too. I guess it was to make a point to the audience that they were all of one class, dressed in off-white "uniforms", and Becky was in red to make a contrast between them and her. If that was the reason, it is sort of insulting. I haven't read the book. If their costumes are like that in the book, maybe it's explained there.

reply

Did you mean sashes?

reply

Sort of, but they didn't seem to be worn as sashes are usually worn. Or maybe I don't remember it right. I didn't pay a lot of attention in that scene to the costumes, just to note the women were all dressed alike.

reply

There is an interesting mini-documentary about the costumes on the DVD special features. The costume designer explains that women's clothes of the period tended to be in light pastels and whites, with accents of vivid color in ribbons and such. The designer reversed this aesthetic to fit Mira Nair's vision, so that the principal fabrics were very vivid or deep, and the accents were in the pastels. Maybe in this scene, they have made a conscious decision to portray the more historical color palette in the society women's costumes, while Becky, the outsider, maintains her subversive deep-toned look? In either case, I recall a splendid shot from above, with the women turning on Becky, leaving her in the center of a bunch of cold shoulders, with their ivory white sashes flowing behind them.

I haven't read the book either, but I own a copy with original illustrations by Thackeray, and the clothing is in the Victorian style, with sausage curls and big crinolines and such. I know that Thackeray liked to use deliberate anachronisms in his historical pieces to clarify analogies to contemporary life, so maybe that has something to do with it. I don't know if he usually described clothes. Clothing seems to be a secondary concern in a lot of nineteenth century books.

reply

actually i found the costumes atrocious- out of place out of the time period screaming colours etc....

reply

It isn't really meant to show anything except that director Mira Nair wanted to throw in as much reference to Indian culture as humanly possible.

__________
Everybody needs love. Have you held your hostage today?

reply

I didn't realize that red gloves were part of Indian culture.

reply

The color red has played an instrumental role in Hindu customs and beliefs. Couple that with the fact that in the Regency era you would be hard pressed to find a room full of fashionable society women dressed near identically in light cream gowns with bright red gloves and it is obvious what she was trying to do. A crimson shawl or sash maybe, a feather adorned turban, perhaps but fiery red gloves? I think not.

__________
Everybody needs love. Have you held your hostage today?

reply

I would describe them as more of a deep burgundy than a fiery red. In either case, red is also important and symbolic in Christian religion, and along with purple and blue, also indicated nobility in European cultures. The influence of Indian culture on Mira Nair's work is of course undeniable. Yes, the use of Indian music and visual motifs is very conscious in this film to create contrasts, allusions to British colonialism, etc. I'm not trying to make a case for the gloves being period accurate, but I'm suggesting that there may be more than one intention for an aesthetic choice. This movie generally goes for a slightly edgier, almost rockstar aesthetic rather than the conventional BBC treatment of the period. Red gloves may make a vague allusion to Indian culture, but in this particular case I think they are more a part of that edgier aesthetic, along with Jonathan Rhys Meyer's faux hawk. In both cases, aesthetic realities of the time are exaggerated to make a bolder, more modern statement.

reply

Dude she was a black sheep amongst the flock. Black dress vs. white dresses. Super obvious.

reply

Check out the Frock Flicks podcast about this movie... it has a really great explanation about this book, the roots of the book, and where the director wanted to take it.

"Religion is the opium of the people" - Groucho Marx

reply

My problem with all the styling, costumes & hair, is that it is so put of character for the time. The uniforms are horribly inaccurate (though those knee boots did look fabulous!). I don't mind when this kind of thing is done well and matches the mood of the whole movie. Like, a Baz Lurhmann movie takes everything to the extreme. But when you've got a script that is relatively true to the time period, the rest of the movie shouldn't be bizarre.

reply