MovieChat Forums > Captain Corelli's Mandolin (2001) Discussion > The Book (spoilers if you havent read it...

The Book (spoilers if you havent read it)


the book is so good but this film is terrible!
they changed so much it was almost funny. in the book, Mandras never meets the Captain, Carlo is gay and is in love with the captain, Mandras leaves and joins a Greek communist group and returns to the island where he tries to rape Pelagia who shoots him, Pelagia and the Captain never have sex, they are not reunited until old age, Lemoni's mother does not get shot, the doctor dies in the earthquake, Velosarios saves the Captain (not Mandras), Gunter Webber has blond hair......
Also, Drousula was not ugly enough in the film

they totally left out; Hector, Franchesco, Psipsina, Arsenios and Alekos

On top of this Nick Cage and Penelope Cruz were awful and there was no chemistry between them whatsoever

reply

The book has such wonderful, intricate language. The film doesn't even compare, it's just a schmaltzy ridiculous flick. The film nearly stopped me from reading the book, and I'm glad I found someone who's tastes I trust tell me that the book is amazing (and she agreed that the film is terrible).

reply

Not only is the movie little more than a tattered fragment of a wonderful novel, it's just a plain bad movie on its own merits. Nicolas Cage is a one-note actor who should stick to movies like "The Rock" and "Con Air". However, I can't blame the lameness of the movie on him; the script and direction are so bad that Olivier couldn't have rescued this disaster.

The novel is so rich and complex that the only way to begin to adapt it would be to make a TV miniseries out of it. Even so you can't transfer the richness of the language to the screen.

reply

I re-read the book last weekend, and it reminded me just how bad the film is. Some things should not be attempted, and this was one of them.

Gene Hunt: She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot

reply

I totally agree with all of you. The novel kept me half of the time smiling and moved and (the most of time) crying, I never cared so much for literary characters. I accept that a film cannot addapt a novel being totally faithful, and that some things must fall apart from screen BUT I HAVE NEVER GOT SO ANGRY AFTER WATCHING AN ADAPTATION!

reply

BUT I HAVE NEVER GOT SO ANGRY AFTER WATCHING AN ADAPTATION!


At the time that was exactly how I felt, but the years has allowed me to look at it with a cool(er) head...

Fortunately, I first watched this film before reading the book and I was sitting with my Mum who had read it, she was making a fuss all the way through about it not being right and to be honest I didn't understand the problem. I enjoyed it, thought the acting was good and I cried in the right parts etc.

Until a year later and I read the book….

I couldn’t believe what they had done…or hadn’t done is more to the point. They had roughly cropped a small chunk out of the middle of one of the best books of the last ten years and shat on it! (excuse my French)

After a while it dawned on me, that to turn a 700 or so page book into a film that’s two hours was the daftest thing about this adaptation. We get 3 hour films all the time know why couldn’t have been longer and had more of the story?
It didn’t have to everything but most of the previous posters have said, certain things needed to be there to make sense.
- Carlo, was their biggest mistake, the fact that he has a bigger role in the book that Corelli is cut completely from the movie and the love for Corelli he feels was the only reason he throws him self in front of the German’s bullets. It didn’t need much, just a couple of lines and a few looks to Cage would have done it!
- Then the completely leave out the fact that when Mandras comes back, a shell of his former self he has joined a dangerous group that rule worst and do more damage to the Island’s people than the Nazis! The rape scene (among others) was horrific and dramatic and would have again, only take a few minutes…instead they bail out on the true drama they had handed to them on a plate as have Bale walking through the mist as the scene changes in to ‘sometime later’!
- Finally (I could go on but I won’t) the fact that in the movie Pelagia and Corelli sleep together. This is the most outrageous thing of all, not because I’m against pre marital sex but that both the characters were. Pelagia is engaged to Mandras and though she finds love somewhere else never breaks her promise. The whole point is that she never marries and ends the story as an 80 year old virgin because she waits for him, even when all hope is lost. Love that conquers physical intimacy - A concept too far fetched for American producers obviously!


One day I hope that some brave soul will re-make this story for television as a ten parter, only then can we think of getting a film that had all the detail and drama of the book. Unfortunately, by the time that happens, gem of actors John Hurt will be too old to be involved!
A shame, that’s what this film was…

reply

[deleted]

I have already seen the movie two or three times, - love it then and even now, treasure my DVD copy of it - before I read de Bernieres book. After reading the book, I watched the DVD again and found the movie even more enjoyable. I don't know, it may just be that I'm another one in the minority, given that we have different individual taste and different emotional reactions to a movie, that I appreciated the fact that the movie concentrated the story to the four main characters of the book, Pelagia, Dr. Iannis, Mandras and Captain Corelli. I've learned years ago that a movie adaptation from a book does not always make an effort to be as accurate as the one written by the author. A movie has certain limitations that it has to conform with, one being the time constraint. And that it has to be given artistic liberties to make changes as it sees fit.

I've said this before in some threads on this board and I'll say it again: This movie is a neat and compact story of a love triangle, credibly and creditably performed by the actors, overlayed by the angst of a global conflict and a civil war on the island itself. Penelope Cruz (Pelagia) with her sharp, distinctive facial features blending in nicely with the Greek pastoral setting. John Hurt as Dr. Iannis, giving an outstandingly authoritative performance. Nicholas Cage, as the fun, music-loving man incongruously finding himself in the military service, yet mature and responsible. Impressive Christian Bale as the uncouth youth, illiterate then metamorphosing into the literate fanatical communist doctrinaire. Then the supreme star of the movie, the sublimely magnificent mountains, land and seascape cinematography of the island of Cephalonia.

I can understand why there are those who strongly dislike, even hated, this movie. I agree that the book is great - brilliant over-all. Some parts of the story are wonderfully witty and satirical. Some parts are lingeringly haunting in its poignancy. It has such vividly apt description of the ambiance of the Greek island and its inhabitants. But there are parts that are just too harrowing to read; I had to put the book down from time to time to breathe in some fresh air. One example are those parts describing the seemingly endless hardships experienced by Carlo and Francesco together during the war campaigns against the enemies, made even more harder by Carlo's suppression of his homosexual feelings towards the latter, the former consoled only at the very last by the loving words of the dying buddy. Carlo's own lonely existence afterwards and finding another one to love, again in secret - in the person of Captain Corelli, then sacrificing himself to protect the beloved. There was also Mandras who found out in the end that all the communist pedantry he has learned are not the one that would give him the sense of security and recognition he craved for so earnestly and found permanent peace only in the company of his dear old friends, the dolphins - in the sea. The book has plenty of sub-plots and a number of other characters who had equally colorful lives. I even recall that tall, blond English spy who was mistaken for a god of some kind by the goat shepherd up in the mountains, who went about with Father Arsenios and evaded being noticed by foes for what he truly is during the terrible times in the island, only to be shot and dismissed so nonchalantly after the war. I don't know how all these could be accomodated in a 2-hour movie, more or less. I just don't think giving a hint about them in one or two scenes will do them honor and to the author himself. I do agree with one of the poster above that a TV series will better for the entire book.

Doing a movie of a love story between two young persons with intellectual incompatibilities, and who were drawn only towards one another by libidinous impulse of youth is complicated enough, as it is, then weaving it in time of war, international and during a civil war complicates it further. Then another love story between two persons of different nationality and cultural backgrounds gives it another twist, although this time driven more by a kinship of intellect, emotions, spirit and yes, by tempered sexuality. It is intricate enough and to add anymore subplots and lead characters will just be extraneous to the film.

I like the movie as is. I admire how the director cleverly resolved the conflicts. Not in any way stereotypical Hollywood. Captain Corelli and Pelagia meeting again - two persons who has individually gone through so much in their past and has moved forward in their lives - when there are already a few grey strands in their hair. The meeting was a quietly teary, nonetheless emotional scene, tender serenely beautiful moment; none of the hysterical running-to-meet-each-other-out-in-the-open-field and no overly dramatic outpouring of emotions.

And I admire Mandras open-ended exit after his scene with Pelagia - the lonely, rejected fiancee quietly, mysteriously, vanishing into the darkness of the night. It's not as unforgettably haunting as his dying scene in the book, but it is just as memorable ... to me, at least.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Truth has an inscrutable,inexorable way of seeking out and revealing Itself into the Light.

reply

i'm glad i just read the book, and didn't get a chance to see the film yet.

blessed are the forgetfull, for they get the better even of their blunders

reply

To the poster that said they didn't show Carlo's love enough, If you had listened to the movie you would have noticed that he says "I know how you feel..." and then he says something like if something would happen to him your whole world would stop.

They could have showed his love a little more, but I thik the way he was so protective of Corelli and that line whould have shown that he obviously felt something for him. I mean why would he have said it?



Stars, they're like little holes in the floor of heaven

reply

This is one of the first films I think of under the heading, "The book was so much better!"

reply