MovieChat Forums > Bedazzled (2000) Discussion > Director's career should be over for was...

Director's career should be over for wasting $$$ on rock star scene.


Review the IMDB trivia section and you will find an easter egg on the DVD with an additional scene where Brendan plays a rock star. This post is about that scene.

That scene is WAY out of character with the rest of the movie and could have never worked in this movie. It's also way out of step with the persona that Brendan Fraser has built up so far in his movie career. Brendan basically always plays the same character in all his movies: a goofy, lovable, sweet, naive bumbler. He's that way in all of his movies and he's that way in this movie. That's why people pay to go see a "Brendan Fraser movie," because they know what to expect and they like what they get every time. That's how "movie stars" (as opposed to character actors) work and that's why a movie star's name on the marquee can draw an audience. This movie is compatible with his persona, the movie as a whole is a light, sweet, cute comedy.

But the rock star scene, while it has lots of merits on various levels including a great performance from Brendan, is way too dark, and would have been obviously so just from reading the script. Drugs, the F word, vomiting, suicide, public sex (oral and otherwise), all of that content is way darker than the rest of the movie and it's out of place. It's a good thing they cut the scene because it would have ruined the entire movie.

The scene is fully shot at what must have been great expense. Fortunately someone smarter than the director saw it in time and wisely got it cut. What I don't understand is how any director's career could have survived such an easily foreseeable misstep.


reply

Well the movie itself was about Brendan's character making all of these ridiculous wishes to which he would become ridiculously different people. You found the rock star scene dark but not the druglord wish?

reply

My memory is fuzzy on the druglord scene but yeah, I remember watching it and not thinking it was all that dark. Brendan doing drama in his own Spanish, that pretty much lightens the mood right there.

reply

The director's career IS over.



"I will not go down in history as the greatest mass-murderer since Adolf Hitler!" - Merkin Muffley

reply

In the druglord scene, he was appalled by the fact that he deals in cocaine and wants to leave the business. In the rockstar scene, he acts like a total *beep* and doesn't regret any of his actions.

reply

This movie is nearly a 100% copy of the Bedazzled (1967) version. Got most of the same scenes and even some of the same dialogue. In the original film one of the wishes is to be a popstar. So naturally the remake would have gone for a similar scene, just with a rockstar wish.

reply

The rockstar scene was hilarious!Maybe for the ratings it was cut.The acting with characters was great.VERY wide band for all!

reply

The scene is fully shot at what must have been great expense. Fortunately someone smarter than the director saw it in time and wisely got it cut. What I don't understand is how any director's career could have survived such an easily foreseeable misstep.


I have a problem with the way you are condescendingly referring to the director of this movie as "the director" and not even mentioning him by name. Do you even know who Harold Ramis was? Egon from Ghostbusters? Movies like Animal House, Vacation, Stripes, Caddyshack and Groundhog Day?

You casually wish that his career be over just because he shot a scene which couldn't be used. That is stupid. All directors shoot scenes which end up on the cutting room floor. It is not bad directing. You have to do what is best for the film.

Anyway, Harold Ramis passed away a couple of years ago. I hope you feel terrible for the way you've insulted him.

reply

I agree, the OP sounds like a jerk. Why do you think it was deleted if they didn't like it? Geeze -_-

reply