Requiem for Innocence


Edited 11/3 to take out some unkind comments about slasher film fans.

I am cross-posting this message on about 30 old horror films from pre-1980 in the hopes that somebody out there shares my despair. There are so few messages for this tour-de-force of Vincent Price, I can only conclude that it is "unloved" by today's standards. This is sort of a message in a bottle. I am feeling very lonely from my experience of the last few moments:
It is nearing midnight on Halloween 2006. This evening I've been flicking through TV channels and getting very depressed. True I have my DVDs to rely on, but I find it sad that there are no good old-fashioned monster movie marathons. You would think you'd be able to rely on the Sci-Fi channel, but for some perverse reason they are showing some wrestling federation. What "professional wrestling" has to do with sci-fi is quite beyond me. Any other movie channel acknowledging Halloween is showing slasher films.

For most of the past 25 years, the fun, the spookiness, the elegance, and the CLASS are all gone from horror films. Frankly, I hate to think what films I'd be watching if I were as "jaded" as today's audiences. I am in mind of a quote from the late Boris Karloff, the Grandmaster. A recent book on horror films recounted Boris talking to author Robert Bloch at a party, and Boris said: "There is nothing pleasant, nothing appealing about the word 'horror.' It doesn't promise entertainment. You and I, each in his own way, have devoted careers to providing chills, shocks, shudders. But we've done so only to amuse, to fulfill the same function as the time-honored teller of ghost stories who offers a few cold shivers to his audience in front of a warm fireplace on a winter's evening. No harm in that, surely. But I'll be blasted if either of us ever deliberately set out to horrify anyone. All this violence and brutality today, shown against a 'realistic' background -- now that's downright horrible!"

If you find these wonderful old horror films "lame", it's nothing to boast about, and I'd keep it to myself if I were you because it speaks more poorly about you than it does the film. To the contrary, it's quite sad if you find them lame. Most today think the only merit to a film is how good the CGI special effects are. Or how many times they employ the cheap "cheat" where they play an obnoxiously loud chord of music to jolt the audience out of their seats (whether anything frightening is happening on the screen at the time of the loud music blast is immaterial). How lazy the creators of good horror films have become and how sadder still for those who watch them. They've desensitized themselves in a way that denies them 50 years worth of classics. There is no sadder word to describe someone than to say they have become "jaded."

reply

Bravo!

reply

I just had to reply to this and say that I totally and wholeheartedly agree with you on this. The horrorgenre of today has become to much of delivering a certain amount of schock per minute from a formula.
It was much more enjoyable when they didnt try to schock you all the time, but buildt a history to base the movie on.


"The yelling will cease and the killing will commence!"

reply

I watch this film every Halloween, there is no one better than Vincent Price! Truly a chilling masterpiece and a brilliant performance.

reply

Nothing is romantic anymore. To embrace modern horror is to accept vulgarity and banality. I suppose all that can be done is to fervently cling to relics of a Time more sublime.

reply

Well said, Betty27. "Fervently cling" is what I do best now. I recently saw Boris Karloff in "Bedlam" and I could not believe how poetic and beautiful the dialogue was. I kept thinking how audiences of horror films must have been much more literate and thoughtful 60+ years ago. No audience today would sit through such dialogue. Certainly not without the 10 second edits or the constant camera shaking to try to draw the audiences failing attention (kind of like the way parents put colorful mobiles over a baby's crib).

reply

There is some irony in the fact that it was Robert Bloch to whom Karloff made this distinction - Bloch is one of the men responsible for all those slasher movies, being the writer of Psycho.

What's the Spanish for drunken bum?

reply

You make a good point, Fringomania, but 'Psycho' was made more slasherish in the film (by Alfred Hitchcock, whom I actually disdain, mostly) and it isn't his best work. Robert Bloch is far better at his intelligent short stories in my opinion.

And, I agree with the posters in this thread. The horror genre has been dead for some time. In truth, the coffin might as well be nailed shut. Gone are the days of dialogue, plotting and thoughtful moments of chill, as the day of cheap ''shocks'', banality, plotless drivel and anti-intellectualism are dawning. Give a good Vincent Price film or the BBC adaptations of M.R. James's stories any day.

"Namu-myoho-renge-kyo"

reply

Great post. I know I am 4 years late in responding, but I share your view.

I recently discovered classic horror movies and there is a huge treasure trove of Vincent Price, Hammer Films to discover on DVD nowadays.

I too, despise the jump scares used in modern horror films. Today's horror is stale and unimaginative compared to the classics, in my opinion.

reply