Moore’s Clarice was a moody cow and difficult to identify with. This is a problem with the ‘strong female lead’ - if you take it too far you just get a film led by a stroppy Karen who puts off the audience.
Foster’s Clarice was ‘strong’ insofar as she was determined and morally incorruptible, but she was also vulnerable. Character’s need vulnerability if we’re to connect with them emotionally, and women are naturally vulnerable so there’s even less excuse with a female lead.
I don’t know whether it was Moore, the writer or the director’s fault, or all three, but they failed to bring that crucial vulnerability to Clarice.
reply
share