Why are the weapons from earlier times more powerful than later weapons?
What i mean is:
1000AD Iron Sword
65m BC Flint Edge.
surely, the Iron would be stronger than the Flint. Not so!
is anyone else confused by this?
(Lion-O): Thunder, Thunder, Thunder, Thundercats, HO!
(Tigra): Ho? Where?
[deleted]
i know. it just doesnt make much sense, logically. (then again, nor does time-travel, so i think i'd better shut up now...)
(Lion-O): Thunder, Thunder, Thunder, Thundercats, HO!
(Tigra): Ho? Where?
Hmm ya, I agree. It is kinda werid. Also, don't you get items like "stone helm" in prehistoric age? Oo
How the hell can stone be used as good protection??
But I guess it is as the above poster said, it works like that in a game. I wish they would've come up with more logical eq names and explanations tho. Wouldn't have been that hard.
mind you, it does explain why humans became the dominant race on that world: Stone Age Technology, "Ruby Gun"s, even better than the Plasma Gun in 2300AD! seem's tech's regressed with time...
(Lion-O): Thunder, Thunder, Thunder, Thundercats, HO!
(Tigra): Ho? Where?