Probably THE Worst Show ever on TV
EVER
shareIs that all you could come up with ? Try harder next time - your brain cells might start working.
lol To be a fan of this show with all it's wanton and blatant historical inaccuracies - YOU should be questioning if YOUR brain cells are working lol. *beep*
shareUm...if "historical accuracy" is the key to a show being good, there are a long, LONG list of shows that by YOUR definition should be pure crap!
We don't watch TV to only see reality...we often watch it to escape reality.
I wasn't a true fan of "Relic Hunter," but it did have it's moments, and often it was a fun show to watch, even as I wouldn't rank it a "classic" by any stretch.
Why don't you shelve the "LOL" elitism...your totalitarian nature may force you to mock those whose taste is different from yours, however the show was on TV for a couple of years BECAUSE not everyone is like you!
Thomas Kretschmann, who appeared in a couple of episodes, is absolutely heavenly!
I totally agree with andell here. At the conclusion to the 1989 film Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Indy and his father travelled to the temple containing Christ's holy grail which is supposedly located in Alexandria, Egypt. In fact, as anyone can tell, it is actually located in the famous Al-Khazneh Nabatean temple of Petra in Jordan. The producers totally made up their own set of historical facts. If lhamud wants adventure films with 'historical facts', he should skip most of the Indiana Jones' shows. All these fictional shows were created to draw the viewers attention from historical reality as andell writes.
Even in the first and famous 1980 Indy show--Raiders of the Lost Ark--the producers write that Pharaoh Shoshenq I stole the Ark of the Covenant when he pillaged Jerusalem and brought it back to Egypt's capital city, Tanis, which was now reportedly long lost under Egypt's deserts. This is definitely historical fiction. Tanis was never 'lost' under Egypt's deserts; how could it be when it was located in Egypt's fertile waterlogged Delta region? Egyptologists located it long ago in the 19th century; it was always above ground due to its location and the fact that it bore numerous massive ruins of Ramesside era statues and stone columns. The Bible states that the king of Judah, Rehoboam, gave all of the treasures out of the temple of Jerusalem to bribe Shoshenq I to leave Jerusalem alone in Year 5 of this Judahite king's reign but I doubt he would have surrendered the Ark of the Covenant, the symbol of God's link with the Hebrew peoples, himself.
Each writer and producer made up things as they go in history--even Shakespeare. The key question is whether the end product is worth watching and I believe that most episodes of Relic Hunter (RH) meet this test. RH was a very funny and interesting show overall even if it had some minor repetitive Indy themes of hidden rooms, passageways and traps, for instance. But there were some innovations too such as the climatic scene in 'Roman Holiday' when we find out that even Julius Caesar's reputedly invincible breast-plate could not save the life of a man wearing it from the spear of a dead Roman soldier. Could anyone have imagined that outcome? Who could not be emotionally moved by the powerful climax to the season 1 episode, Irish Crown Affair, when the O'Donnell clan's loyalty to the late king Boru's memory and his crown was tested beyond all boundaries of comprehension and they were labelled traitors by their own Irishmen for allegedly swearing loyalty to Henry II of England when they were, in reality, swearing loyalty to king Boru, the last king of Ireland.
The only major loss I noticed was when the unconventional but energetic Buffy-like office secretary Lindy Booth left the show at the end of season 2 and was replaced by the tad more generic Tanja Reichert. While Reichert was funny in some season 3 episodes especially for her overacting in 'Arthur's Cross' and her improvisation in 'Antianeiral'--in saving Sydney's collection of ancient relics--basically in the final season of Relic Hunter, the producers focused more on Sydney and Nigel at Tanja's expense. That was why we mostly saw her at the office desk taking or making phone calls for the most part.
I'm with the OP, I just finished watching an episode and I'm almost angry at how bad it was. Tia Carrere should have just called it quits after Wayne's World.
shareReally now, The show was a very cool show in it's time, of course it seems hoky now. So do the original power rangers and old sci-fi movies like invasion of the body snatchers. However, those are considered classics and were amazing in their time, this show was pretty well done with plots and such, and had a nice bit of humor. Since it's only recently that people began researching to make their shows as accurate as possible (and they still fail) I'm actually surprised all the historical elements weren't simply made up. This show, may, in time, become one of those shows that the true fans turn opinion around and people began buying the DVD's or something. In any case, I am still a fan, and Nigel is still my favorite character.
shareAre you kidding? This show wasnβt good for its time. It was, and will always be, Indiana Jones for feminists.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
So you clearly never saw True Lies.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
I guess you've never watched House of Payne.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
I won't claim that Relic Hunter was the best show ever or that it is historically-accurate. But it was a FUN show. There are very few shows out there that a pure fun...even most comedies aren't. They might be funny but they aren't necessarily fun. There's a difference. Sure, Relic Hunter was cheesy, a bit ridiculous at times, but it was probably one of the most fun shows ever on TV. And for a very low-budget show, it was more than entertaining. That's what I watched it for. It was fun and I had a fun time watching it.
shareI agree with Cloudburst. Relic Hunter was a very funny show with the tough and professional Sydney working with her sometimes incompetent but linguitically fluent (ie. he could translate ancient texts and symbols) sidekick, Nigel Bailey. It was leavened with flair and humor; while the show was not always historically accurate, Relic Hunter was not 100% cheesy or plain ridiculous. Yes there were the predictable ruses, deceptions and 'traps' and the typical hidden passages/corridors or 'secret rooms' behind a fireplace mantle, fountain, cave or some other object but RH was always a low budget Indy themed show. At least it was interesting most of the time. Certainly, there were some bad RH episodes...but wasn't the 2008 Indiana Jones release even worse? That was a near disaster--even with a big production budget, viewers could almost fall asleep watching 'Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.' That was just plain BORING unlike Relic Hunter.
shareCertainly the stupidest post on imdb EVER.
shareOh I don't think so. According to its wikipedia entry, Relic Hunter has been shown on TV in Estonia, Slovenia, Spain, Brazil, Germany, Austria, Italy, India, Sri Lanka, France, Hungary, Latin America, Sweden. Finland, Israel, Czech Republic, Turkey, Bulgaria, Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia, Romania, Norway, Poland, Russia, the UK, Ukraine, Portugal and Vietnam...apart from the US and Canada. Of course, the show would have been translated to suite local tastes in these other states. That's a pretty impressive list for this miniseries with a small budget. The only countries I don't see it played in is in any Muslim dominated states (except Turkey) at present perhaps because they disapprove of a female protagonist. Are the viewers in all these countries outside Canada also stupid seliossama? If the show wasn't fun, it wouldn't have made it on foreign TV in a big way because their viewers would not watch it in the first place.
On another topic as an aside, one can check on youtube and type in "relic hunter Making of Season III Part 1" and you get this interesting 7 minute 13 second segment where the producers talk about where they plan season 3 of Relic Hunter to go. Anyway, Tia and Christien give an overview of the history of this miniseries. Yes, Christien does say that initially he was supposed to play a Hugh Grant like character but what Tia said was more revealing. She said that the producers first saw her as a 'female Indiana Jones' and this makes complete sense to me. She was not supposed to be a Lara Croft lookalike at all. Lara Croft and Relic Hunter were really two separate entities. And no, the scripts for Lara Croft just don't compare in quality to those of Relic Hunter's best or better episodes. Sydney Fox was always closer to Indiana Jones; in 'The Last Knight'--perhaps one of the best Relic Hunter episodes made--Sydney even grabs a whip to cut down her relic rival Rita Rosellini and retrieve some Templar relics which Rita had stolen. We all know where that idea came from. With Indy, we had 4 major stories and 4 short and brief mini-stories whereas with Relic Hunter, one got 66 individual stories. Many were extremely good (MIA, Fountain of Youth, Transformation, Irish Crown Affair, Midnight Flight, A Good Year, Arthur's Cross) and some were turkeys but most were respectable.
Anyone who claims that an adventure show is not 100% original in the 1990s or today is kidding themselves. The last truly original adventure or sci-fi show to come out in my view...was Indiana Jones and 1977's Star Wars. By now, all the tricks in the book have been hashed and rehashed repeatedly. There are no more tricks in the bag except special effects. Most sci-fi fan fans loved the new reincarnation of Battlestar Galactica because of its excellent scripts and acting--not because of its sci-fi effects.
ππ»ππ»ππ»
share