MovieChat Forums > Super Mario 64 (1996) Discussion > suprising info on mario...........

suprising info on mario...........


theres going to be a part 2 of super mario 64 its super mario 128 the reason for the 128 is because of the bit that nintendo gamcube has plus they havn't showed it to public yet becuase the creater doen't want his ideas to be stolen look for this game in 2005-2006

reply

[deleted]

N64 had 64mb of RAM, therefore Super Mario 64.
The Revolution will have 128mb of RAM, therefore Super Mario 128.

reply

N64 had 64mb of RAM, therefore Super Mario 64.
The Revolution will have 128mb of RAM, therefore Super Mario 128.

Nintendo- 8 bit
Super Nintendo- 16 bit
Nintendo64- 64 bit
Gamecube- 128 bit

And I assume if the pattern continues, the Revolution will be 256 or above.

reply

i'm still waiting for Super Mario 8 =p

--
davepoobond
http://www.squackle.com
http://www.gamersmark.com

reply

[deleted]

I think since the console market is moving primarily into having good graphics cards for its games now, it's moved on from "Bit" games. It just basically works off something else, although if there was going to be a Mario 128, it would of been released on Gamecube, it'll be called something else now. The mario 128 of the Gamecube was "Super Mario Sunshine." Although it was different, it was still a Mario game, and the graphics were alright, eh?

Anyway... that's all I have to say about that!

-----------------------------------
Look into my eyes, do you see an ounce of "gives a *beep* .."..?

reply

[deleted]

"N64 had 64mb of RAM, therefore Super Mario 64.
The Revolution will have 128mb of RAM, therefore Super Mario 128."

Hahaha, no. The N64 had 4 MB of RAM, the expansion pack upped it up to 8 MB.

reply

Well, Mario 128 is a code name for it. Just like the Revolution was a codename for the Wii, and Project Dolphin was a codename for the Gamecube.

"Mario 128" May also be codenamed that for this reason......

The first one was released on the Nintendo 64 right? Well, if Mario 64 has a sequel, 128 is double of 64.

Just another possible reason, nothing definate.

Why does it seem like people without disabilites often act more retarded then the ones that do?

reply

[deleted]