The film is a gem, and comes over fine to many people from different places when they get to see it, but I agree that much of the specific cultural frame would have to be changed for a remake. Not sure how it could be done if the film were to be staged in a US '70s context (US remake films are mostly set in a US context, or in some place and age well known to US viewers).
It's vital to the balance of the film that these people are not looked down upon, we get to see their quirks and their sometime naiveté, but also their honesty and good will; the director isn't sneering at them or inviting you to pass them off as a bunch of cranks or fools. I think that balance would be hard to achieve in a U.S. frame with a mainstream film because the kind of "culture wars" that had been raging in the background of that kind of lifestyle, and had in part shaped it, were never laid to rest in America. In Europe this is something that's mostly exited from serious political and human confrontation - people don't actually walk around exuding "Hippies, leftists and draft dodgers destroyed this nation!! They should be dragged out and spit in their faces!" within current political debate - but in the U.S. people can still be lethal enemies over issues of who opposed the Vietnam war, ran a magazine or marched for abortions back in 1970, who voted for Nixon or McGovern, etc - or use those as thundering political bullets in a campaign forty years later. And the open, observing, warm tone of a film like this one is hard to achieve if many people are still down in the trenches about the kind of people involved.
reply
share