You know, people, especially in america have an easy time saying they wouldn't have a problem with this, but I think they're kidding themselves. Anyway this is actually a much bigger issue - conversion and religion as cultural identity.
Christianity claims to be a universal truth, but it isn't and never has been. When there was widespread (forced) conversion, one of the ways they did it was to adopt local customs and incorporate them into christianity. This accounts for statues, icons, mary fixations, etc. Part of this that which is still used today is the 'aryan jesus' concept in artwork. This is a joke, but no bigger joke than putting easter, all-hallows eve and christmas at the same time as pagan holidays. My point is that "universalism" spread only as long as it changed with each cultural identity, with a little christian spin on it!
Christianity is an offshoot of judaism and jesus was a jew, so it stands to reason that he'd look like one. And even though christians read the bible with great vigor and love to celebrate the seder and other christian/jewish customs, if they had to look at someone that looked like Judd Hirsch I think they'd be a little less enthusiastic about it! If he looked like Osama bin laden it would be even worse. But they'd never admit it. It's the same reason whenever they used to make Anne Frank movies they'd get the cutest northern european looking white girl they could find to represent her, so the average american wouldn't be put off and feel slightly less than sympathetic for the plight of the jew in WWII. I swear holocaust museums probably owe a debt to Millie Perkins!
So I don't know if american christians would hate jesus, but there might be less christians in the whole world if jesus insisted on being represented as his old world hebrew human form!
reply
share