Anyone Else See the Implied Criticism?
When Frank and Hawk land the simulator in rain, high winds, and sans computer, and again at the end when Frank lands "for real" sans computer, did anyone else pick up on the implied criticism of how we've become dependent on technology to do our jobs for us? All the younger astronauts said a landing couldn't be done without the computer (autopilot) and that a catatrophic computer failure could not happen.
Yet the original Mercury Seven, all test pilots, rejected the "spam in the can" idea by the design engineers - that the astronauts be mere passengers along for the ride, the computerization of the spacecraft would handle everything. Humans couldn't do the job.
The Apollo 13 mission proved the validity of the human side of the argument.
BTW, some Project Mercury trivia...at least John Glenn (if not all the Mercury astronauts) wore a Breitling Cosmonaut chronograph for a wristwatch. The Cosmonaut is the same as a Navitimer chronograph (for those who know what I'm talking about), but with a 24-hour dial. The Mercury capsule instrumentation either didn't have a clock or the clock used had a 12-hour dial or a 12/24 hour dial. The 24-hour face of the watch was the only way the astronaut could tell the difference between Noon and Midnight, since they were circling the earth once every 92 minutes or so.
And this little design detail oversight was made by the same people arguing for "spam in the can".