Better Fued: Austin vs. McMahon OR Sting vs. NWO
Which fued did you think was better out of
Sting vs. NWO- Best fued of 97
Austin vs. McMahon- Best fued if 1998
Which fued did you think was better out of
Sting vs. NWO- Best fued of 97
Austin vs. McMahon- Best fued if 1998
STING VS nWo!!!!!!!!!!!
shareSting vs NWO.
Tell ya the truth it took me a while before I got into Stone Cold.
IMO, Austin/Mcmahon got too much focus on, got repetitive starting off Raw with a 30 minute segment and usually ended with Austin winning the battle.
Austin / McMahon.
Sting vs. nWo was good and definitely entertaining but the entire focus was on he and "Hollywood" Hogan which was completely shot to crap at STARCCADE '97. Their match at SUPERBRAWL was totally unnecessary as Sting should have gone on to face Scott Hall instead of having that match at UNCENSORED.
Sting really only needed to battle Hogan, then Hall and then he dropping then Savage and then Nash. Once he defeated all four of those guys he could have lost the belt to GOLDBERG.
GOLDBERG vs. STING would have been just as awesome as HOGAN vs. GOLDBERG.
What do you mean, "You people"?
Sting Vs. NWo
when he walked to the ring which was full of NWO dropped the bat and started taking them out all on his own. That was so awesome.
and usually ended with Austin winning the battle.
Definitely Sting, though Stone Cold actually wrestled during his build up. Sting just took a vacation until Starrcade with Hogan.
share