Smackdown is better than Raw

Title by title.

I like Owens, but Ambrose is the real deal. A much better wrestler. He's had a number of clean wins and he's done it leaving the Club behind. He has the title that goes all the way back through the Hulk and Sammartino.

Owens has interference often just like Rollins did. He won the title after he was demolished and HHH handed it to him. There is a major weakness because over a month later we don't understand why HHH did it.

Intercontinental Vs. US title. Miz is a true heel. It's a great story that he passes himself off as a Hollhwood A lister, and having a beautiflu blonde wife makes him even more hatable.

On the other hand, after all this time Reigns does not have a clear character. As hard as they try, people mostly don't like him.

Tag teams: Slater has been a loser for a long time and creating a scenario where the ultimate loser becomes champ has been brilliant. The New Day have outstayed their welcome, and we need to move on from Booty O's and playing the trombone at ringside. They are good, but the Slater story is better.

Women. I will concede that Charlotte, Sasha Banks , and Bayley are better than any woman wrestler on Smackdown. Except I don't care about women's wrestling and fast forward through it when I can

Same with cruiserweights. They have brought in a bunch of new guys and I could care less. I don't like watching cruiserweight matches.

Finally, management. So far, Daniel Bryan and Shane have been pretty vanilla and uninteresting. but on Raw, management is a negative. I've had my fill of Stepahie and HHH forever, and want the focus on the wrestlers. And Foley is one of the all time cgreats, and he gets overshadowed by the McMahons. I hate seeing Mick have the role he has now.

This may be healthy . for years Raw was the better brand and Smackdown second tier. Doesn't hurt not to just have Smackdown equal, but actually better.