Jim Sucking Boob!
Did he realy suck on the womans tit becaus it looked like a very authentic tittisuck
shareDid he realy suck on the womans tit becaus it looked like a very authentic tittisuck
shareHe sure did boy/girl :D
"Enjoy yourself -- every day above ground is a good day."
Hi, Gotta admit I luv'd the Tittisuck, but if ya listen into the DvD commentary, theres quite a humorous spiel on it.
Cheers
D
Beam me up Scotty, i'm in heaps of s***down here...
yeah it was real I think anyway.
shareIt was real, and the breast belonged to the great Shannon Whirry, one of the most gorgeous women in the world.
share[deleted]
[deleted]
lol
http://z11.invisionfree.com/The_Stomping_Grounds/index.php
There's a whole lot of fail in this thread.
shareI seriously doubt it was real. It looked pretty fake, not to mention that its pretty disturbing if it was real. It would make that scene borderline porn, and jim carrey is the last person I want to see in a porn.
sharethat hardly makes it porn.
you obviously dont watch porn, if there is no nipple shown especially.
and jim carrey is the man, only he could do something so vulgar and make it hilarious.
"Excuse Me While I Light My Spliff, ...Good God I Gotta Take A Lift."
Yeah, a grown man sucking on a breast...thats not borderline pornographic.....ok....
All sarcasm to the side, It still looked like a fake breast anway, so it doesnt matter.
"borderline pornographic" and "pornographic" are not the same thing.
yes, it was borderline but definitely not any worse than anything else shown in this movie as far as crude humor goes.
"Excuse Me While I Light My Spliff, ...Good God I Gotta Take A Lift."
There was nothing pornographic about it unless he opened her up 180d and started pounding her right there on the bench!!
That does have to be the most satisfying funniest scene i think i've ever seen! for them to even consider such a scene and pull it off was genius!!! LOL
The tit looks REAL...
Well regardless of whether or not it was real (and I suspect it was) it is still not porn.
Pornography is any creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire.
That scene was certainly not trying to simulate sexual desire as it was a joke and hence not pornography.
Just so you know.
A random stranger starts sucking on a random woman's boob.... how the hell is it not porno? Well i think its actually worse than porno cause one of the involved people, the woman, is not even consenting (as portrayed in the movie).
Just my opinion.
It's not porn because it is not intended to cause a sexual response. Videos of people giving birth are incredibly graphic but not porn either.
The Dictionary defines pornography as "Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal." This scene did not attempt to cause sexual arousal, therefore, it is NOT pornography. Duh.
sharePornography is intended to be sexually stimulating. It is a fact that a Lot of people cannot see a nude woman, without thinking sex. This is the fault of the viewer. it is also a sign of immaturity. There is sexual nudity, and then there is non-sexual comedic nudity.
There was a famous scene in an old Ryan O'Neil movie where he rips the back of his jeans and is walking around with holes where is butt cheeks are. It was seen as Pure campy comedy. It is in no way sexual.
I am pretty sure that the very people that thought this even close to Pornographic found the love making scene in Team America also Pornographic...even though there is absolutely nothing at all sexually arousing about the scene.
Before you say " this is borderline porn." you need to really know what porn is. And just because there is nudity, and there is contact between two people which can be construed of a sexual nature. if the scene is Intended for comedic value, and is not in any way arousing, it's not Porn...
Perfect Example, the threesome scene in American Psycho....I saw that and all i could do was laugh... he is... posing before the mirror, pointing at himself basically saying " you the man... you the man..."
Porn? Go look up the definition, and try again. Porn SPECIFICALLY has to have the intention of "creating sexual desire".
If a 2 second tit suck by a man who's pretending to be a baby makes you stiff instead of laughing, that's your issue, not the movie.
And as far as "fake boob", WHY? There's plenty of actresses around to use for the body part, and JC didn't seem to mind doing the act.
[deleted]
[deleted]
I just saw a gif... she looked like she was kind of enjoying it
sharelooked quite organic and real. i dont think they had authentic boob technology on year 2000 to make it look that real.
..dont try to get tough with a keyboard
It looks like the white strap thing seperates skin from a prosthetic or something. Doesn't look real to me.
shareShe was wearing a nursing bra, which has a flap that can be opened to allow for breastfeeding. What you saw was the top portion of the bra and the flap was down to allow for suckling.
shareYes, it's real. I believe it is. Even the dvd commentary says so as well. Only Jim could do that on camera and make it funny.
shareI didn't think it was real. maybe so.
---------------------------------------
Scooter? what have u done to me?
It was real.
In ME, MYSELF AND IRENE, Jim Carrey confessed that during the scene where he breast-feeds from Shannon Whirry, he felt very uncomfortable and embarrassed by the fact that Whirry did have milk on her breast (she was nursing her baby during the time of the filming). On the other hand, Shannon Whirry said that she made that scene as normal as possible, and didn't feel a thing.share
That's interesting because I thought Jim seemed zany enough to not think twice about doing that scene. It's good to know something embarrasses him. No offense to Jim, I like him a lot, just seems like nothing would faze him.
I've already seen the worst movie ever made, so it can only be uphill from there.