MovieChat Forums > Family Guy (1999) Discussion > Why did the FCC allow Family Guy to bash...

Why did the FCC allow Family Guy to bash them?


In one episode, Family Guy completely bashes the very real FCC(which governs what can and cannot be said on the radio and TV), implying that they are a bunch of uptight, butt hurt, stiff people)Usually when a TV show is bashing a real corporation, they alter the name to not get sued, such as Spongebob bashing Mcdonald's with Krabbyland(Mr. Krabs makes fun of kids giving money to be entertained by a talentless clown, a parody of Ronald McDonald, who is a clown) Why did the FCC not go after Family Guy for openly bashing them? :-/

Drake is repetitive. He just raps the same thing over and over as if he is in an insane asylum!LOL:D

reply

Well, first of all the FCC is not a private entity like McDonald's, or intellectual property like a copyrighted character, it's part of the government and a series of movie can mention or even make fun of it, within certain limitations of the law such as libal laws (which even then legally may go nowhere or get dismissed before trial).

And secodly, while many Federal agencies are now aciting like depostic Socialist and Communist counterparts in other countries, strictly speaking it's not quite "out" or fully there yet in those regards, so for the time being you can still make fun of them.

_____
The New Number 2: "Are you going to run?"
Number 6: "Like blazes. First chance I get."

reply

True. Plus nothing should be free from getting bashed by Family Guy or South Park.

"I hate my life."-Ed Bighead

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I heard the FCC liked the episode (and for good reason, that episode is a classic).

reply

I wish it never got popular demand on bringing the god damned show back on FOX before quagmire started the feud with Brian unfairly seasons later

reply

I'm glad that the show came back unapologetic because Family guy rocks. The fcc sucks anyway.

reply

Why the sad smiley? It would border on dictatorship if they weren't allowed to bash them. It doesn't violate FCC's rules (as even they are not as bad as the censors in China, Iraq and North Korea for instance).

reply

Right, I just don't understand why the FCC still even exists. Shows on other networks get away with saying the S-word or, on occasion, the F-bomb on cable T.V.

If anybody remembers, George Carlin tore them a new rectum in one of his standup comedy routines since they arrested him for saying the seven dirty words over the radio. Some Catholic priest heard it in 1972 and went completely ballistic. Even Lenny Bruce had the same fate in the 1960s.

One of these days, they'll be extinct. South Park (1997) fought them by saying the S-word 162 times in one episode back in 2001. From then on, the FCC changed the rules around and started allowing some swearing.

Still, the major networks typically do not allow it for fear that advertisers may not sponsor them.

reply

Many basic cable networks have loosed their rules. For example on FX American Horror Story they can show rear nudity and say sh#t or d#ck but not the f-bomb or any other kind of nudity such as breasts or genitalia. Even that is starting to change because Sons Of Anarchy featured the f-word a couple times as did The People vs OJ. Plus all the gore and violence in AHS would still likely get an R rating if it was a theatrical movie.

reply

You guys are forgetting the fact that the FCC doesn't regulate Cable TV content, only Broadcast (over the airwaves) TV. Cable TV stations have their own private censorship rules. Broadcast stations have their own rules too, in addition to the government (FCC) rules. Broadcast NETWORKS, on the other hand, while having rules of their own, are also not regulated by the FCC. Networks, both broadcast and cable, as well as cable channels, guide their own private censorship rules according to those of the FCC simply 1) to "tow the line", and 2) because their shows are or might in the future be shown on Broadcast TV STATIONS, which are the only mediums with regulated FCC content.

BTW, it is irrelevant (though a little perplexing) that individual TV stations that broadcast (over the air) are on your cable TV provider and the majority of people have cable; it is merely the fact that SOME of the public (no matter how small or dwindling the segment) watch these stations over the air, that makes the FCC regulate their content. This shows how outdated and behind the times the FCC and its content rules are.

However, if they ever update them, they're likely not to drop the content censorship when almost everything is cable and no longer over-the-air; instead they would likely change the content rules to include cable. This cold prediction is tempered by the fact that network producers and cable channels already have their own censorship, which are MORE STRICT than FCC content restrictions, which (per the "tow the line" reference I made above) keeps the FCC from updating anything.

BTW, examples of private TV censorship which even the FCC allows on broadcast TV, are the use of the word (or words) "goddamn" and a character shown "flipping off" somebody (the middle finger), the latter ironically even in cartoons where the character doesn't have a middle (or even ANY) fingers (or only has 3) - how many "fingers" does Brian have?

Really it's not the FCC we have to worry about - they're benign; it's the corporate company channels and networks and individual stations with their own privatized censorrship that are the real threat to freedom to watch what we want to and the freedom for creators to produce what they want to.

To clarify, South Park has always been shown on and produced by a cable TV channel, and so the FCC cannot regulate it. Family Guy has always been produced by and originally shown on Fox, a broadcast network. South Park producers know their cartoon will never be shown on broadcast TV, while Family Guy originates on broadcast TV though has been syndicated on cable (like Adult Swim).

As for making fun of the FCC, parody is protected by the 1st amendment. Ironically the South Park episode referred to here would be protected, as it parodies the FCC, and the S-word would thus be allowed in that episode even on broadcast TV. But no network or cable channel corporation is daring enough to let it through because of their tow-the-line attitude.

reply