Jamal not likable


I have two major issues with the Jamal character. First of all, he DID cheat. You can't just take another writer's first paragraph and have it be OK because the original author gives you permission AFTER the fact. And besides, he lied about having written them before Forrester bailed him out.

Second of all, missing the free throws on purpose he let the team down. Sure, you don't think about it because the film never develops the characters of the other players other than the jerk point guard, but it's still a majorly flawed action that he did.

reply

by jms22 » Sat Nov 21 2015 ...Second of all, missing the free throws on purpose he let the team down.
Althogh poorly done I thought it was a "?" as to whether Jamal missed those shots. Forrester asks him at the end, "... Did you miss them of did you miss them?" and Jamal responds, "That's not exactly(?) a soup question."

" Three can keep a secret... if two are dead "

reply

Looking at other posts I guess I'm wrong.


" Three can keep a secret... if two are dead "

reply

Well, he's not as hateable as someone who's full grown. I knew as soon as Connery said that what was written there stayed there, we'd have a problem with it. And yes, I did hate it when he did the spoiled brat thing of trying to turn it back on Connery because he didn't tell him it was published. Excuse me, he'd agreed to the rules, then broke them. That makes him a capital "J" Jerk. Yes, he didn't tell anyone about his association with Connery, but he still lied. In the modern world, I guess we're supposed to feel all warm and fuzzy that he at least got one thing right.

And yes, he missed the free throws. I think he missed the first one out of sheer nervousness, but I used to watch basketball a LOT once upon a time, and the guy threw the basketball way too hard on the last one for it to do anything other but bounce off and come back at him. He could have tied it up -- something I had to explain to my husband who NEVER watched basketball -- but he chose not to. But that was his way of giving the whole school the finger. And yes, I like to begin sentences with prepositions. 

Still, if princess didn't know he was there to be the ringer, he was outrageously naive. His TEST results gave them the warrant to put him in the school, but his academic record stank on ice. He was getting straight C's at a bad school. He was there to play basketball.

As someone who had to carry a jock through a class, I'm here to tell you ol' F. Murray would have been told to sit down and shut up and let the child (basketball) prodigy shine. His job would have been to pass princess along until he got out of prep school. That's the way the real world works.

When evil is viewed as good, righteousness is viewed as evil.

reply

The plot was completely contrived as already mentioned. My problem was the actor selected from a casting search to play Jamal. I thought he was completely wooden, surly to a fault and without any warmth at all.

I intend to live forever. So far so good.

reply

I guess it would be easy to come to the conclusion that the plot is "completely contrived" as you mention but, then, if that were a true concern 90% of all scripts would be thrown out on face. It would be like a movie being based on the premise that a woman, who after being involved in a car accident, convinces her attorney to hire her as a legal assistant even though she has no real experience. Once on the job, she is going through a case and, after looking at some medical records, finds evidence of wrong doing by company which made an entire community's residents sick and eventually convinces them to sue and brings this large company with endless resources to their knees and forces them to settle a case worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Kind of silly and contrived plot, isn't it? Oh wait, that's the plot of the movie Erin Brokovich and is based on a true story and it happened mostly that way. Ooops.

If I can suspend disbelief when I concede that Peter Parker was actually bitten by a radioactive spider and becomes Spider Man, then I can believe that, on a dare, an African American teenager breaks into the home of an elderly Caucasian writer and the two of them build a relationship based on a mutual gift of writing and forge a friendship based on their experiences. IF that is the sole basis for a plot being contrived then Harry would never had Met Sally, Superman would never have Returned and everybody in Seattle would be Sleeping just fine.

As far as Jamal's character being wooden and surly to a fault, I found his character to have more feeling and caring then what should be expected from a person with his experiences. He's a 16 year old African American boy who, in the past few years of his life, saw his father leave his mother after failing to keep his drug abuse in check, watch his brother leave the house, his mother struggle at being a single parent, be uprooted from his school and transplanted into completely sterile and strange environment - one that he obviously isn't most welcome in. After all this, the fact that he doesn't morph into a serial killer or Alien Predator is amazing. He show's amazing compassion to William at several times throughout the movie and, in the end, even though he pulls a real dick move in turning in the paper he worked on at Williams home, he still stayed true to his word and took the punishment for his actions instead of giving up his friend William. William repaid his kindness by reciting another one of the writings Jamal left in William's home.

I guess if you show a little compassion for what made Jamal's character the way he is, it's pretty easy to see the compassion in his actions.

reply

Technically, he didn't really cheat. The author of those words, Forrester, gave him permission to use that paragraph (assuming it was just the first paragraph). It was wrong that he didn't properly attribute the those words to William, though.

Which is more morally, or ethically, reprehensible? The school giving Jamal the ultimatum of 'win state, or be expelled', or Jamal's decision to tank the free throws as his statement against that ultimatum?

reply