How would they have handled 9/11?
Would they have not touched upon it, tried to save the Twin Towers/Pentagon?
What are your thought or opinions?
Would they have not touched upon it, tried to save the Twin Towers/Pentagon?
What are your thought or opinions?
I'd never even heard of this show before tonight, but my first thought when seeing it was, "Dang. I wonder what they'd have done with 9/11?" As cool as some of these ideas were y'all had, I think it's best to be left alone. It's such a sad subject now, and was even worse at the time. I mean, look at Pearl Harbor. That used to be viewed with such emotion, fear, hatred, and overall reverence. Now, we use it as a backdrop for a romantic summer blockbuster. Don't get me wrong, the film did a great job of capturing the true emotions of the time and a good patriotic sense, but it wasn't a pure war film or patriotic film. Then you look at WTC, a movie that was all about the 9/11, and it was just a brutal attack on the senses bringing to mind all the emotions and fears we had that day. It's not the kind of subject you can touch with an almost campy sort of, low-budget tv show. Not yet. Now, if there's ever a Seven Days Remake in, say, 10 or 15 years, that might be a great topic to start off with. But it's not time yet. I'm not ready for it. And I don't think this country's ready for it.
shareI think that question falls into the category of "Why didn't James Bond go after the IRA, or Osama Bin Laden?" and "Why is it that Dr. Who can't go back in time to save people or the Time Lords, yet he goes about and messes around with the timeline constantly in less important events?"
That is, it becomes incredibly problematic for the writers to make a logical framework for time travel and still have it have any sort of dramatic effect in an on going fictional narrative.
[deleted]
[deleted]
I'd say, just as the comics handled it. DC and Marvel both addressed it by having issues about the attack that put more emphasis on the real life heroes, the police and fire fighters and the regular people helping out; and having the superheroes lending them a hand. They could have had Frank not able to backstep for some reason, so instead he and maybe other members of the team, help out at ground zero...
So no one else is chasing this ambulance? A cop on a bike is all we got today?
They would have sent Frank Parker back seven days and he would have shot all the terrorists dead before they got on the planes.....and of course, he would have run up a huge bill on that titanium credit card!
sharePerhaps it would have worked if they could have shown Parker going back for much bigger disaster, which happened top happen on 9/10... he could have gone back, stopped that one. Then, 9/11 happens... which they did not know about, because the first, worse disaster would have stopped 9/11.
That way he still saved lives, and it would make 9/11 still unavoidable by the crew... because it takes too long to charge up the power supply on the sphere to go back a second time, and fix that. It would have shown a real human dilemma... you cannot fix everything, no matter what your power or abilities. Something would slip by, at sometime...
It would have been very dramatic, to have him stop the first disaster... return to the base, and then have someone mention it was the 10th of September. That is all they would need to do... I think that would work without being tasteless. Proto.
[deleted]
As much as I used to like watching Seven Days it's for the best the show was already canceled before 9/11 happened. It would've created a very uncomfortable situation for everyone if the show was still going with the premise of stopping disasters by going back in time when something that catastrophic happened in real life with no way to possibly fix it. Even if the show was renewed and slated for a 4th season they may have ended up having to cancel and end it right on the spot because of what happened.
share