Should they reboot this?


And do a version that is actually respectful to the source material?

reply

The original discussion was whether you could prove you made an edit of Pulp Fiction. I said you make this edit in 3 parts and prove you made it. You agreed to that stipulation, then hilariously failed to deliver. Dude you had it man all you had to do was follow through. I can prove by our previous posts that you agreed to that stipulation.

No I was talking about every single nomination. I was also talking about just in general. I factor in imdb, box office, RT, MC, and Oscar nominations. City of God did exceptional in imdb, RT MC and received best adapted screenplay nomination. So it debunks your claim about 2003 having no good films.

reply

I did provide an edit of Pulp Fiction into a trilogy, if you had any testicles you'd concede that you were wrong.

No you were talking about Best Picture and it boggles my mind that someone can actually be dumb enough to think City of God was nominated for Best Picture. Buahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

reply

Um no you did not. You said you would provide an edit that you yourself edited. That was links from a youtube channel which someone else did. You failed.

No you were talking about Oscars period. It boggles my mind someone can actually be dumb enough to think City of God was not nominated for any Oscar at all. Buahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

reply

I did provide an edit, your definition failed to specify the format it had to be in so therefore I win this round. If you had anything resembling a testicle you'd admit you were wrong.

No we were talking about Best Picture and you said the third segment of LOTR had to compete against City of God, you failed miserably and I still can't fathom that anyone could be stupid enough to make such an idiotic statement but you continue to surprise me. HAHAHAHAHAHA

reply

Nope you failed. If you had a testicle you would admit you lied.

No we were talking about Oscars period. I can't believe you were stupid enough to think it received no nomination.

reply

I can't admit to something I didn't do. I provided an edit of Pulp Fiction consistent with your very own definition of a trilogy. Maybe you should have thought this through a little better.

OMG now you're trying to backpedal, you are so pathetic. I bet the next idiotic thing you're going to try to argue is that Saving Private Ryan won Best Picture of 1998, holy sh!t that is so the kind of moronic comment you'd make LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ROTFFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

reply

So you are lying again? Wow talk about no guts.

Now you believe Saving Private Ryan won best picture? Wow man dumb seriously.

reply

What??? I said I can't admit to lying because I didn't lie. I provided a Pulp Fiction Trilogy that is consistent with your definition. The fact that your own definition bit you in the ass isn't my problem that's a you problem.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, I didn't say that you idiot. I said that was the kind of thing you would argue. Reading comprehension really isn't your strength is it?

reply

You are now lying about the fact that you lied. Pathetic! I asked for an edit which you yourself edited. You agreed to this stipulation and then failed to deliver. Not my fault you were too incompetent or lazy to follow through. You lost this round.

No you believe Saving Private Ryan won best picture. Boy what an idiot!

reply

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, what backwards logic did you have to apply here to reach that conclusion? You either need to go back on your meds or you are really reaching.

LOLOLOL, go back and read my post (don't worry I kept it at a 3rd grade reading level so you would understand it), that is very much not what I said.

reply

I have posts we had earlier. Remember you aren't writing in pencil my friend. I have proven you wrong so many tines I've lost count.

I reread it. I can't believe you think that won best picture. I'm still laughing.

reply

Then you're reading comprehension isn't even beyond that of a 3rd grader. I clearly said that was the kind of thing that you would argue, not that I was arguing it. I cannot believe you are this stupid, I had a really bad day today but I gotta say laughing at you is almost making it worth it.

reply

Then you're reading comprehension isn't even beyond that of a 3rd grader. I clearly said that was the kind of thing that you would argue, not that I was arguing it. I cannot believe you are this stupid, I had a really bad day today but I gotta say laughing at you is almost making it worth it.


You're reading comprehension? Don't you mean your reading comprehension? Wow what an idiot! Get this people this guy claims he is the principal of a school lol!

reply

Lol I’m typing from my phone you moron. A minor grammatical error isn’t anywhere near the ballpark of thinking city of god was nominated for beat picture . Nice deflection attempt however

reply

Someone dumb enough to think Saving Private Ryan won best picture would make an excuse like that.

reply

Someone dumb enough to think I actually said that would make an excuse like that.

reply

Oh there is no thinking you did lol.

reply

"I bet the next idiotic thing you're going to try to argue is that Saving Private Ryan won Best Picture of 1998, holy sh!t that is so the kind of moronic comment you'd make LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ROTFFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Are you mentally challenged? I'm being dead serious and if you are I need to know because that would mean I need to lay off you or else I'm a bully.

reply

You lost your right to talk about Oscars after you claimed Saving Private Ryan won best picture.

My comprehension is much better than yours. I at least know how to use grammar correctly. Need I remind you the way you used you're? Yeah enough said. You said you're reading comprehension is not beyond a 3rd grader while ironically insulting yourself. The correct way to say it is your reading comprehension not you're reading comprehension. What an idiot!

reply

You lost your right to talk about anything after you claimed I said that.

Also speaking of reading comprehension: "You lost your right to talk about Oscars after you claiming Saving Private Ryan won best picture." Buahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

It's "You CLAIMED Saving Private Ryan", NOT "You CLAIMING SAVING PRIVATE RYAN". What an idiot.

reply

Um apparently you read it wrong? Think before you try and correct somebody next time LMAO! Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit now is it? Poor Hippo you need to get your head examined my friend.

You lost your right to talk about Oscars after you claimed Saving Private Ryan won best picture.


Looks fine to me LMAO! I literally took that right from my own post. This is embarrassing man. You are done dude.

reply

LOL, nice try with the edit, hahahahahahahaha. You are such a coward.

reply

Um nope! Read again my friend. You are done. You lost! It is not my fault you can't read.

reply

Keep trying to weasel your way out of this, it ain't gonna work. You are so damn pathetic, first you don't even know proper English and then you try to edit your post hoping I wouldn't notice. I cannot believe you are this stupid.

reply

I am not the one who used you're in the wrong context. LMAO!

reply

You are such a coward, LMFAO. You don't even know how to properly use the past tense then when you get called out on it you research it on google and then edit your post thinking no one will ever notice. Damn you suck kid.

reply

Nah I owned you. Now stay silent and get an education.

reply

Lol you demonstrated that you don’t even know proper grammar and now you’re trying to backpedal. Not only are you uneducated but you are a coward and I respect neither

reply

No proof of that. I quoted you proving you wrong.

reply

No sh!t you edited your post you moron, LOLOLOLOLOLOL

reply

Nope try again.

reply

Nope try again.

reply

The sounds of the crickets speak volumes. Hungry Hungry Hippo has emerged victorious!!!

reply

Nah I have just been tired. I owned this debate. So next topic is TDKR considered the best third entry by objective data?

reply

LOL you got absolutely destroyed. You edited your posts, you couldn't demonstrate why my Pulp Fiction Trilogy didn't meet your definition and you couldn't defend the legitimate complaints I put forth about LOTR. You're pathetic in every sense of the word.

reply

No answer? Another round won for me.

reply

No answer? You are nothing more than a meaningless, insignificant marble that was just devoured by the Hungry Hungry Hippo.

reply

Sometimes pure silence speakers louder than words, LOL you suck.

reply

No I won this debate as I said. Now answer my question.

reply

As soon as you answer the question that I have been asking you for the past 500 posts.

And no you haven't won anything, I ate you a long time ago, barfed you up and then ate you again.

reply

My advice to you is to just stop watching TV so much and go take some kind of remedial elementary reading comprehension class.

reply

The crickets sure have been chirping loudly recently

reply

"I bet the next idiotic thing you're going to try to argue is that Saving Private Ryan won Best Picture of 1998, holy sh!t that is so the kind of moronic comment you'd make LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ROTFFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

reply

Shouldn't the mods put a stop to this?

reply

This site doesn't seem to be actively moderated. If you think a post is objectionable, you should click the "report" link, then they will see it.

reply

I must apologize for moviefanatic, he will hunt me down no matter where I post and automatically say the opposite of whatever I say, it's very immature on his part.

reply

No I just know how to debunk your arguments. It is rather easy.

reply

LOL the only thing you've debunked is your own intelligence.

reply

Which is why you always deflect when asked a question correct?

reply

Considering you deflected from my questions I guess that means you just conceded that I won. Thanks

reply

It's a sociological experiment at this point.

reply

No.

reply