Historical Accuracy


I've read a few discussions arguing whether or not "Spirit" is historically accurate. Some say that the horse legends are false, or that the atmosphere is contrived, and so on and so on. I posted this to clear up any misconceptions about the history.

A brief summary of mustang history:

Wild horses lived in the Americas tens of thousands of years ago, but died off during the last ice age. In the early 1490s, Spanish explorers introduced European horses back into the Americas. Some of these horses escaped and became feral mustangs - the ancestors of Spirit's herd. Native American tribes bought or tamed (or stole) these horses, and legends claim "the grass remembered" the horses' hooves. The Nez Perce tribe in particular became master horse-breeders, and are famed for breeding the Appaloosa.

Spirit's story takes place in the 1800s, when horses were already well-established on the plains and with both the Native Americans and the pioneers. It's quite logical that Spirit would feel he "belonged" in the wild, since his ancestors had been feral for at least 300+ years.

A brief summary of the social atmosphere:

The story takes place in and around what are now the Black Hills of South Dakota. The timeline is the mid-1860s - the half-finished rail in "Spirit" was completed in 1872. During this time, the Lakota tribe had openly hostile relations with the white pioneers (yes, in this case most of the pioneers were white). There were many skirmishes, battles, and assassinations between the two factions during the 1800s, and defeats and victories were dealt on both sides. In light of the social atmosphere, the hostility between Little Creek and the Colonel is very believable.


I hope this has shed some perspective on the historical accuracy behind "Spirit." However, as many other reviews have pointed out "Spirit" is not perfectly accurate; it has, unfortunately, clinched a few biased stereotypes. Flawed as it is, I still very much enjoyed it. And well, there was a lot of research involved in the making of "Spirit".

And I appreciate that. :)

reply

Hey osomohso,

Awesome information u have given... was very interesting to read ... I appreciate ur research on this ...

reply

Wow, that was really interesting reading.. thanks a lot for all this info! =)

reply

Thanks, I think therefore this film is about as historicaly accurate as a fictional film told from the point of view of a horse can possibly be.

reply

someone's got a bit of time on their hands, don't they...

You be your own hero.
~ Chad Ginsburg
I The Mighty Boosh

reply

[deleted]

Actually, the history of the mustang is still heavily debated, mainly whether or not they're 100% feral, because that would mean the difference between federal protection and the mustang herds being completely at the mercy of ranchers and mining companies. There is some evidence that proves that the original Spanish horses may have interacted with a species that was similar enough to breed with but not as evolved (sort of like a Spanish conquistador breeding with a cave person).

"I wanna, I gotta be adored."

reply

A big thanks from me, too. Interesting info.

reply

How about this for historical accuracy. All the white Americans were evil, crude barbarians while the Indians were noble and perfect in every way. What a great film to teach American kids the all important lesson of hating themselves.

reply

Why are you replying me?? Why don't you reply the OP?

reply

Stop fighting with people. The guy made an honest mistake, you didn't need to call him out on it.

Some people count sheep. Doesn't work with Out_to_Kill, just gets him excited ~ John-Redcorn

reply

[deleted]

why r u constantly attackin` StartingAllOver14 4 fightin` with people? he was just standing up 4 himself, he wasn`t fighting.

reply

Since there was no Indian in that movie, your post is quite inaccurate.
Assuming you were talking about the Lakotas, that is still inaccurate.
The army guy that took Spirit out of the train was fairly nice with him.
And even the guy in charge, at the end, accepted to gave Spirit and Creek their freedom instead of death, so he wasn't that bad either.
As for the rest, don't forget who invaded whom... it's easy to see whose side was more evil anyway.

reply

Interesting post, thanks for the info.

www.yourvoiceheard.net

reply