(I liked the film, but I certainly see all the other problems mentioned. One issue I have is a writing problem, and I've seen this before. If the interrogator (Hathaway) knew that the replicant didn't know it was a replicant, his questioning and harrassment was an unnecessary, pointless waste of time, and unnecessarily cruel. Also, you would think that in any society like the one this is set in, they would do everything medically possible to prove that the 'person' was (or wasn't) a replicant before drilling into its chest for a bomb that should show up on one kind of scan or another. All they'd have to do is knock the subject out, and do the scan then (so it would never see the results and realize that it's a replicant thereby triggering the bomb).)
Yikes! Well, D'Nofrio CAN sure play an unnecesarilly cruel character, but Yikes! I guess the thinking is: It never hurts to try and interrogate, if only to see how the 'device' reacts, although with the thought that iOlham could have gone off, that seems like a risky move. Hathaway WAS absolutely convinced that this was an evil alien killing machine that horribly murdered one of earth's best people, so you really can't blame him for wanting to get some jabs in.
And the solution to finding out? Yeah you're really really right, but I don't remember if they had that 'option' in the short story and it might have been put in just to give Olham something to do for 2 hours. Filmaking Mill 101. If a 'Voight-Komf' test actually existed they probably would've used it eh? But as they say 'Then there wouldn't be this movie'. *sigh* great story though, and I agree the end shot with the pupils was priceless, left me 'wonderfully stunned'.
reply
share