***SPOILERS*** Why Sue?
Why kill off Sue in the end? There was no point for it.
My DVD collection:
http://mrdudeman.dvdaf.com/owned
[deleted]
MovieChat Forums > The Rage: Carrie 2 (1999) Discussion > ***SPOILERS*** Why Sue?
[deleted]
Sadly, Sue was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
...In Which I Shall Destroy Every Little Piece Of Good Left In Him!
From "Sparkly Wiggles"
In my opinion it was to show there isn't going to be any more Carrie movies and if there is Sue won't be back so they killed off the character.
It's a dog-eat-dog world out there,and I'm wearing Milk-bone underwear
I can't believe they got Amy Irving to reprise her role. That's pretty rare when a sequel is made over 20 years later.
share^^ (cough) Halloween H20 (cough)
Monkey B is not a person...Monkey is a soul, that LIVES, in many bodies.
Yeah, another good example. There aren't many out there.
shareAnthony Perkins and Vera Miles returning for PSYCHO II is another great example.
"Cinema is everything to me. I live and breathe films -- I even eat them!"
- Lucio Fulci
Keep 'em coming folks. I love when others do the thinking for me! LOL
shareRicky, Angela and a couple of others returned for Return to Sleepaway Camp.
--Daniel W. Kelly, author of "Closet Monsters" and "Horny Devils."
Just another way to show a connection with the original movie. Here, Sue was the "Miss Collins" of this movie, so had to suffer a similar, untimely fate.
sharei believe it was TO show that the innocent dont always survive (like carrie there were innocent people at the prom i.e. Tommy, Miss Collins, Frieda etc.) and they all die in that film and they were all innocent but died as a result of another person's stupidity like Sue here
share[deleted]