In all honesty
I was in college when I first saw this. I caught it on HBO one afternoon, and quickly fell in love with it. I've always been the kindof person who trades movie one-liners with my friends... and so the film really spoke to me when its characters followed suit. I was, and am, a huge William Shatner fan... a Star Trek fan, and have an overall boycrush on anything sci fi. Then I got older.
I'm 26 now... and I happened to catch this movie on HBO again... and I have to be honest... it's not very good. Don't get me wrong, it's cute and entertaining... but I have to throw this opinion out there to counter the blind adoration that people are lobbing on these boards.
The actors do a pretty good job in my opinion - Eric McCormak was very good, as he usually is when he gets to play a fusty, arrogant schmuck. Rafer Weigel was... eeh... he was okay. Audie England, however, was loathsome. I can't tell if this is simply her character, or the way she played her... but I found Claire to be rude, selfish and irritating. It's the little things that add up for her character, and in fact for every facet of the film. In the scene where Robert tells Claire that he's got no money, since he lost his job... why did she then agree to his taking her out for dinner? Am I as a viewer supposed to feel bad when he ditches her goldbricking ass? Shatner was... Shatner... bravado and swagger and not much talent, but still the guy's got style. He is what he always was... a big glazed ham... and that's why we all love him.
Where the film loses me is the script. Sure, the "Stay on target"s are cute and fun for their recognizability... but I have a question: If you took the references out... what would you have left? Essentially you'd be left with a rigidly formulaic romantic comedy about unlikable and two-dimensional characters. Shatner's the best character in the damn script... and he actually exists! How often in the film are obscure SF references just pasted into the script? I get the specific references to Star Trek episodes, as these are two men molded by the show who are hanging out with William Shatner. That fits. The rest of them, however, are weak at best. If they were really woven into the story, they'd manage to be clever... and some of them do... but most of them dont, and rather than burning with wit and cleverness... they just kindof lay there like a dead fish.
Needless to say, any film with a black character who listens to Yes and ends with a musical number sung by William Shatner is good entertainment... but I think our collective feeling of inclusion, and geek giddiness is clouding our judgment a bit. I realize that the director of this film (supposedly) reads this forum, and so I realize that what I'm writing may appear rude... and I apologize for that. I really don't mean any disrespect... but I have to respond when I see the word "genius" being tossed around about a romantic comedy. There has only been one genuinely brilliant romantic comedy... and that was French Kiss - a film whose success exists only because of the brilliance of Kevin Kline.
So that's it. Flame me all you like. I'm curious to see what others think of this.
http://eugenicsbeginswithyou.typepad.com/