Well, I can see where you'd get that. But, I beg to differ.
Slauson, indeed, knew the story but he did not believe a word of it. He did not like Captain Boyd to begin with and he thought the Captain was plain loco/disturbed/cowardly, etc so he had no reason to believe or take him seriously that any of the cannibalism story was true... especially after the scene where Boyd falls to the floor when he sees Ives, then later on when Ives shows him his chest and there's nothing there.
I definitely do NOT think Slauson would have become a cannibal even after eating the stew because he did not actually know what was in the stew. It could have been some type of animal meat for all he knew. Because I seriously doubt that Ives would have left parts of Major Knox laying around the camp with Slauson coming, so there would have actually been no proof that anything like that took place.
With regards to Colonel Hart being there with his throat slit, YOU KNOW Slauson would have chalked it up to Boyd having gone crazy and killed him (which he did, LOL). I don't think in ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM. Slauson would have attributed any of it to Ives.. all the blame would have gone to Boyd.
So, yeah. There's my take on it.
------
"There's nothing that a little less attitude wouldn't cure!" *slap*
reply
share