Tony Danza's Absence

Actually, its a run on sentence and its still quite clear what i'm saying. Tony Danza sucks, and isn't talented. and the reasons he sucks, is because the work that he has done. Do you understand now, or would prefer me to rephrase it another way?

Also, pity and empathy are not anywhere near what i was communicating. i guess having good grammar doesn't reflect your vocabulary abilities.

I'll help you out for your next post when you want to look intelligent:

Pity- (noun) 1. Sympathy and sorrow aroused by the misfortune or suffering of another.

2. A matter of regret: It's a pity she can't attend the reception.

Empathy- (noun) 1. Identification with and understanding of another's situation, feelings, and motives.

2. The attribution of one's own feelings to an object.

now to clarify, because i can tell you often don't understand things. To have Empathy for Tony Danza would mean i am identifying with him and understand his situation, feelings, and motives. Which is a pretty big jump in logic with anything i said. I have no empathy for him. To have Pity for Tony Danza: I would have sympathy and sorrow for Tony Danza because of his personal suffering. Which is insane because if anyone is suffering, its the audience, who maybe I do have pity for.

Now if class is still in session Professor Nosno,

I wrote:
"Having been subjected to Who's the Boss and other Tony Danza fair such as movies like she's out of control, the man isn't talented."

Now i know this is complicated, but you can follow it. I, "Having been subjected to" the works of Tony Danza, is of the opinion that he is not talented. The "I" is implied, because of the logical thought through out the post which was "My" personal Opinion.

You see the real problem here isn't my grammar, its your reading comprehension.

Which is apparent through your response. Which was:

"By starting your sentence with "having been", you set up a main clause whose subject will be HE/SHE/IT that was SUBJECTED to the Tony Danza garbage. But when we get to your subject, it's Tony Danza."

Which is all well and correct. You got book smarts kids. But then when you read in to it, you say it means this:

"I believe this to be a great example of a Freudian slip, and that you secretly pity the man. Your empathy has been hereby exposed. It's nice to know you care!"

Huh? Now where did your brain go? Because even if what you said is true, how is saying that Tony Danza is not talented after viewing his material in any way show pity or empathy or even a Freudian slip (Especially if this such a "Great Example" of a Freudian slip) ? Where is my "slip"? Where is there any point that i express sympathy or empathy for Tony Danza?

Had i done that, yes that would be an AMAZING Freudian slip!