Pawn shop case (The partial return of Shamoli?)(10/8/15)

As soon as I heard Kurt say it was a pawn case, I was hoping Shamoli would walk through the doors.

When the guy was introduced as the manager, and that he was authorized to represent the owner, I instantly thought it was Shamoli.

Then the Plaintiff mentioned that the owner was a woman, and was waiting for her to mention "Shamoli" or "Mrs. Kapoor" but she never did.

Then the Defendant had the video with the owner yelling at the Plaintiff, I was waiting to see her on it but she kept the camera on the Plaintiff the whole time.

Even without visual confirmation or someone naming her, it HAD to be her.

Shamoli is a special case. She was memorable from her first case because of how ridiculous her defense was. The Plaintiff said she went back to pay off her item within the loan period, but the store was gone and she had no way to get in touch with them, by the time she found out where they moved, they had already melted her jewelry because she didn't pay off her loan in time. Shamoli said that she personally hand-delivered notices to every single person who had an item pawned at the store, to tell them that they were moving. Judge Milian obviously didn't believe that.

Then a year later, she was on again and I thought they were rerunning the case from the previous year, but she didn't say anything about the store moving and it was about an employee robbing their safe and running away with the customer's stuff.

After two times, I started looking for case titles that had to do with pawning on the People's Court website that lists upcoming episodes. Then a few months later they had the 3rd case with Shamoli. In the third case, she said that the guy the Plaintiff said she spoke to and took money to extend her loan didn't exist because it's just her and 1 other employee who worked there 7 days a week, and neither of them extended loans. Although if it's just the two of them there, I wonder who was the employee that robbed her in case #2? There must've been at least 3 people working there at some point during that period if one of her employees ran off with her customers' items.

It's been a year and a half since then, so I didn't expect to see her again, but hearing that it was a pawn case instantly had me wondering. All the evidence of the case points to Shamoli. Although I wonder if the store is closed for good like this defendant claimed.