MovieChat Forums > Lethal Weapon 4 (1998) Discussion > Why didn't Gibson grow his hair?

Why didn't Gibson grow his hair?


I am a fan of Lethal Weapon 1, 2 and 3 but didn't like this one at all. I know long hair was a thing of the 80's but I always thought this portrayed Rigg's crazyness of whatever you call it. It would've great if he grew his hair for the movie at least his character would've been consistent. Also I felt we didn't see enough of his crazy persona, I know he has mellowed by this time as he is more stable in his life, but I think they mellowed his character too much.

reply

I know he has mellowed by this time as he is more stable in his life, but I think they mellowed his character too much.
I disagree. I don't think it was unrealistic that Riggs would have mellowed out by this point in his life. Not only is he getting older, but he's been living with Lorna for several years now and is moving on with his life, having pretty much recovered emotionally from losing Vicky, even though he's still struggling with the idea of remarrying. And I do agree with you about his long hair accentuating his craziness, I think that because Riggs has mellowed by the fourth film that's why Gibson decided Riggs would have cut his hair shorter in this film; it visually emphasizes his mellowing out. Also, notice how in the wedding photo of Riggs and his wife that he loooks at in the first film, Gibson/Riggs has short hair the same length that it is in the fourth film. I don't think that's an accident.

reply

Oh ok yea good point about Gibson having short hair in the photograph of his first wedding. I just thought the long hair was a reflection of his character, but yea I guess by the fourth film he regained some sanity in his life, hence the reason his hair was short. Interesting how the hair resembles the personality.

reply

I think in all honesty it had to do with the real life situation since this movie was fast-tracked back in '98 and Gibson simply didn't have time to grow out his hair. I know he would have mellowed out by the time of LW4 but I think the hair is a part of the character and would have preferred it to be there. I guess he could have technically worn a wig but maybe they just decided to keep the short hair.

It's been a while since I've seen LW1 but I do remember the wedding picture. Maybe he just had his hair tied back in a ponytail for the wedding, kind of how we see him in the beginning of LW3.



reply

Honestly This did not feel like a true, real Lethal Weapon because of his short hair.

It just felt like seeing Mel Gibson be Mel Gibson... Taking out his hair made me not see the character but just the actor playing the character.

I can understand they did it to show he was changing, but it just didn't feel the same. it felt really odd

reply

[deleted]

yeah I figured everyone hated the mullet by then

right....

reply

I liked the long hair and wish he kept it for LW 4, but my take on the whole subject is if you watch LW 1, right in the beginning of the film we see that Roger Murtaugh decides to shave his beard to appear younger because he is now 50. Now Riggs has done the same thing.

Also in LW 3 Riggs is already tying his hair up so it looks shorter.

reply