MovieChat Forums > Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005) Discussion > Why Does da CG Look so Bad Now?

Why Does da CG Look so Bad Now?

posted 8 years ago by mikeyflatley
9 replies | jump to latest

I remembered it looked purdy good watchin at theater, no?

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafckka

[–] Conan-1982 8 years ago

You were young: it always looked like sh!t.

[–] ArigatouNosferatu 8 years ago

If you hate this film so much, just do us all a favour and do one.

[–] Apollo_Tweed 8 years ago

Do you have your TV on the correct settings?

[–] Volley2020 8 years ago

What? The computer graphics in this movie are excellent.

I suggest watching it on a beautiful 1920x1080 HD display with 5.1 surround instead of that 32" 4:3 Tube with built in stereo speakers.

[–] thereaperentity-76031 8 years ago

Say what you want about the characters and story, the quality of the CGI is great.

[–] burnsmatthew2012 8 years ago

The CGI in Episode III looked good. Most of it stands up well in 2016/17 in my opinion. Clearly more time and money was spent on it compared with Episode II. Episode II just seems rushed and half baked in many places unfortunately. Still all the prequels have some decent elements that make them watchable.

[–] manchof1 8 years ago

It was made in 2005, Peter Jackson's King Kong has aged worse.

[–] mikeyflatley 8 years ago

Monkey still lookz purdy good 2 me

Werd 2 ur mudda, bruddafckka

[–] DarthKane 8 years ago

Revenge of the Sith is by far the best looking in the PT. Surprising to me as it had the smallest of the 3 films' budgets... only by $2 million though.