SEQUEL ANYONE?


I am surprised this movie did not have a sequel, it would be perfect for it.
The whole film is like a Sherlock Holmes mystery and there were several Sherlock Holmes stories (one may have been inspirational to this, the one wher Sherlock falls in love for his first and only time) so why not make more?.

I could see Stiller going back to help Pullman, or the girl becoming his assistant, or just occasionally dropping in for tension...

whatever the film was great, the lines were all grand, the story had various depths and you were never sure whether to stay on the side of comedy or plunge into the emotional drama of a person so locked in his rationality he can't feel anything anymore.
It was a relief to see Stiller play somebody other that a cringing goof and Pullman was excellent, best part he did in my book.

reply

If ever a movie was begging for a sequel, this is it.

This film is so funny, all the little and subtle bits, like Sergio Knight, in the phone booth a few booths away talking to Steve. The locks.

You can't be too careful.

reply

My wife and I just saw this tonight and loved it. It would be nice to see Pullman and Stiller get back together and make a sequel, a refreshing change of pace as i can't stand most of Stiller's recent goofball roles. And for that matter where did Pullman go? I haven't seen him in anything substantial for awhile.


reply

i agree. jake kasdan hear us, and make it again. we all fans deserve second one!!!

reply

[deleted]

The bad part of doing a sequel is that Kim Dickens couldn't be in it. Or, maybe, she could have a parallel role. Yes, that would be cool. She could, unbeknownst (hope I'm spelling that right) to Zero, help him solve some mystery from afar--say from Argentina or Belgium or something. And he would suspect that she was helping, but he wouldn't be sure. And maybe Stiller could be the go-between. She could be Stiller's secret source. And he'd also have less contact with Zero, which he wanted, but still sort of look out for him. If it was something like that it would be cool, to me anyway. But I'm affraid they'd ruin it with a crappy sequel. Orange County wasn't nearly as good as Zero Effect, in my opinion. I haven't knowingly seen anything from Jake Kasden since.



"You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test."--George W. Bush

reply

Why does everyone think that Stiller can't still be Zero's assistant? Because he quit and got married. Well Zero Said two things, he said that if he ever wanted his job back he could have it and much earlier in the film he told Arlo that he and Jess moved intogether too soon. Zero is the most observant man on the planet....he's right. So it's 8 years later, Arlo and Jess are divorced and he went back to work with Zero, along with the help of Zero's new assistant.

Also the girl....can't think of her name, why cant she be in it? Cause Zero said he never tried to find her....If I recall those were his exact words "I never tried to find her"...that doesn't mean she didn't find him. Or the two didn't just bump into each other once.

They can all be back for a sequal that NEEDS to happen.

reply

Well, I didn't say Stiller couldn't be in it. But, his character did leave Zero at the end of the film. True, Zero said he could come back, but Arlo's response apparently was, "Don't hold your breath." And the fact that Zero said, "I never made any attempt to find her," sort of implies that he never saw Gloria again. But, I guess, these are not impossible phrases to get around.

The harder thing is that the story sort of concluded. Not just the case, but the stories of Arlo, Zero, and Gloria. Zero has to learn to stand on his own two feet. He also finds love for the one and only time in his life. Arlo has his own life to live with his new wife, and Gloria finally concludes her "business" with her father and travels the world. What would reconnect them all? Maybe Gloria tries her hand at being a dectective and has to consult Arlo and Zero on a case. That would make a little sense. But she can't really come back to the country for fear of being killed by Stark. I guess it would be kind of funny to see Zero traveling the world, pointing out obscure facts about Swedish lava lamps and such. But he has a terrible reluctance to even go to Seattle from L.A. to investigate this case. I can't see him flying all over the world very easily.

Finally, there is a practical problem. I don't think the film, as great as it is, made much money. What would be the incentive to make a sequel? To please the critics and a few thousand fans? The movie making industry, like any industry, is in it to make money. And I don't think that a sequel to a movie few people saw in the first place would have very good prospects of being made.



"You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test."--George W. Bush

reply

I have long felt this film is among those rare films that actually deserve a sequel.

I think we should call in Hodgemeyer for it.

reply

I have a better idea. How about a prequel?

"You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test."--George W. Bush

reply

You people are cute! and smart! and crack me up!!! These are all great ideas! I like the prequel, but then Pullman would look too old to play himself....Stiller also.

(Zero was reluctant to fly to Portland, Oregon from LA....not Seattle)

Thanks for the entertaining reading!

.....monica

reply

I just finished watched this film and immediately came here looking for sequel news. Too bad, 8 years later, there's nothing.

Kim Dickens doesn't have to be in it. Love interests change from film to film. But Stiller would have to find a way on board (prequel or sequel).

reply

I posted the above last night. This evening, I was sitting here doing something completely different with Zero Effect thoughts in the background of my mind, when it suddenly surfaced: TV series. Of course, it's perfect.

It was tried, based on the film, back in 2002. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if that was Jake Kasdan's plan all along. I'm betting this is covered in this forum probably many times. I had a look at it and right away could see why it would fail: casting.

Taking 4 years to launch probably indicates that it was a hard sell based on mediocre film sales. Too bad, I think it could have been more successful as a TV series than a film sequel, regardless of what the film brought home.

reply

I don't think Tv Series will be succesful. We all got boring about "Monk" after its first season. I want movie come back, a fresh return!

reply

[deleted]

They could call it "Sequel Effect"

Only the lonely have signatures.

reply

I would be too dissapointed if there was a sequel because the film was so well rounded. It came full circle and did what it set out to do; tied up all loose ends, inspired us as an audience, and generally just rocked. I don't need a sequel. I just need to watch this movie again and again and again and. .

reply