He saw how stacked the deck was against him and recognized that the kind of guys who framed him wouldn't just roll over and turn over the evidence in court. Regardless, if you expect every movie character to be totally rational, then you must be frequently disappointed.
You are correct. I am frequently disappointed by most movies. Good movies are realistic and smart. This movie (and most movies) are not.
Also, I doubt that he would even face significant charges. In the real world, prosecutors have to consider whether or not they can actually get a jury to unanimously agree that a defendant is guilty. Although he technically broke the laws you mentioned, with the circumstances as they are, there's a very good chance you get at least one juror who believes that the means justified the ends. After all, remember that the prosecutor said the public hate crooked cops, and this guy exposed a whole rat's nest full of them.
That is incorrect. In the real world, a policeman would never be excused for doing what the Samuel L. Jackson character did. There are ways to deal with a crooked police force. And going bat-sh/t rogue is no way to do it. Two wrongs don't make a right. Report to the FBI. Contact anti-corruption lawyers. But never go "postal" lunatic.
In the real world he would have been killed. And if by some unlikely scenario he survives and uncovers corruption, the corrupt cops would have to deal with their own investigation, arrest, prosecution and conviction. But he would still have to pay the price for taking hostages, assaulting police with a deadly weapon and, attempted murder of police officers. That is the way the real world works.
Only in movies do police going on a rampage get excused for their crimes. Never in the real world. Especially in a big city like Chicago.
reply
share