5.8? Is that a joke?


Who the hell is rating these movies?

reply

Are you saying it should be higher?

reply

Absolutely!

reply

I think this thing would be in the high 6s if we saw more Michael in the first hour. It takes too long to get to the good stuff.

reply

He's in it a lot in the first 15 minutes, and he's seen several times in between then and the ending.

reply

Yeah, the first 15, but short spurts for the next little while. The ending is where it's at. It's still a decent movie and more impressive considering it's a part 7.

reply

6.1

is a good score for this

reply

I'd say 6.3

reply

6.2, that's my final offer.

reply

the first two acts are really dull but the third act nearly makes up for it

reply

For years it was 5.2. I think changing attitudes and increasing nostalgia towards 80s and 90s genre films have seen a lot of scores for films in that era rise incrementally.

reply

better than 2018

reply

H20 is far better than '18

reply