I agree. It would've been a shame to let Halloween end on the mess that was Curse. Had Carpenter returned and made it his type of movie and not gone the Scream route, with a Carpenter story, score, feel, etc. this movie probably would've been the best since the original. But it didn't go that way and they ended up going with a "fad" that was anything but a Halloween style film. It had it's moments, but it also had it's disappointments. I get that they had to have Laurie kill her demon, literally, once and for all, but they sure wrote themselves into a corner knowing 1. they already had sequel plans and 2. Hollywood never leaves a money maker alone.
Resurrection's retcon could've been way better too. But it is what it is. Fact is this. Without Loomis or Laurie, or some big name to carry it, Halloween just doesn't work. Michael has to have a strong foil and Busta and Bianca aren't it. Hence the dropping of that whole thing and remake/sequel.
At least with them we had a version of Loomis and Laurie back. Now without any of it, the franchise is floundering to find it's footing. Time will tell what we see. So yes, H20 and Res. helped carry the series through the late 90s early 00s but the end result was a bigger mess than Curse ever was. At least Friday and Nightmare knew when to get out while the getting's good and not go straight to video like Pinhead and Chucky. That's just sad.
"He came home." - Dr. Sam Loomis from the original HalloweeN
reply
share