"You want to stew in a Thai jail for thirty years out of "friendship"? "
I think they were trying to make more of point from this story than that Alice did this out of "friendship". She had gotten to a point where she needed so desperately to rebuild her own character and self-worth, so she made what she knew could possibly be the ultimate sacrifice for Darlene and for herself.
"I simply believe that common sense rules over the contrived nobility portrayed in this movie."
True...maybe having Alice offer to serve a double sentence in a Thai jail is a bit extreme to illustrate the point (in terms of storytelling), but anything less that they could have gone through may not have made as strong a statement (to say the least). However, let's not forget that Alice chose to go back without her rather than with her...not instead of her, so it really wasn't that much of a stretch as far as believable "nobility".
Darlene and Alice cared about each other equally, but, for example, if Darlene had given herself up for Alice and said "it was the right thing to do" it wouldn't have made any sense. Darlene was usually "doing the right thing". The story is about Alice evolving, so for her to say that it "was the right thing to do" made sense. Like I said...a bit extreme to make the point? Yes, but it didn't throw me off that much. I thought it was a great point to end on.
Rest in peace, Heath Ledger. You will be missed
reply
share