MovieChat Forums > Armageddon (1998) Discussion > Bruce Willis should have a sequel to Arm...

Bruce Willis should have a sequel to Armageddon as well


Since he already had the latest sequel of Die Hard in which it's now in the North American theaters, why can't have a sequel to this movie and besides, we'd heard about a meteorite landed in Russia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_nOaRpF0DJk

Solve captcha and earn more: www.protypers.com/?id=4HQM

reply

Please.. no more eye-rolling ridiculous, over-the-top silliness that was this god awful piece of cinematic fecal matter.

One installment was bad enough.

reply

Maybe because his character died saving the world in the first film?

reply

Not possible, unless Harry had a twin brother, or something. Like the way Jack Palance (character's name was Curly) died in the first City Slickers but returned in the sequel as his twin brother (character name Duke).

reply

Not possible, unless Harry had a twin brother, or something.

Or another possibility is that Harry comes back as a ghost in which case the movie could be a sequel to "Armageddon" as well as "The Sixth Sense"!


"I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!"

reply

"I see asteroids everywhere"

reply

LOL!!!! Nice one, "chrismahon2005"!


Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'Sir' without adding, 'You're making a scene.'

reply

Hi, I'm Barry Stamper, Harry's identical twin brother."









================

4) You ever seen Superman $#$# his pants? Case closed.

reply

Bruce should definitely do a second installment of this film, but maybe instead of a sequel, he could make a prequel showing how he became an expert miner.

reply

He’s got space-dementia

reply

With Bruce struggling with aphasia/dementia, I don't see this happening, unfortunately.

reply