MovieChat Forums > 54 (1998) Discussion > Where can I find the 2008 workprint?

Where can I find the 2008 workprint?


I recently watched this movie for the first time and I really enjoyed it but just felt things were out of place or missing and was blown away when I heard of the drastic edits, reshoots etc. I ordered a workprint after being very interested in seeing the alternate footage however the workprint is absurdly unwatchable with such an ensemble cast you can rarely even make out a face. some of the stills from the deleted footage have surfaced online with the time code but in much much better quality. I know a proper version was shown in 2008. Does anyone have a copy of that version? I'm dying to see it!

I am crossing my fingers the blu ray on march 6th has the directors cut on it. I'm even worried we wont get those extra 6 minutes we get on the dvd.

Thanks!

reply

No such luck...I posted this previously:

"Specs have yet to be revealed, and the only supplement appears to be a music video." --from Highdefdigest.com

I'm so pissed that this movie has continually gotten the shaft when it comes to extras. I would LOVE to see the director's original vision of this film. The current cut is SO sanitized that it makes Studio 54 come across as any basic disco in the 70s, and that is NOT how it truly was. Even the E True Hollywood Story special from several years ago is more scandalous than this movie. I really like this movie, but knowing that there's a more realistic movie of it out there just kills me. :(

reply

[deleted]

The "director's cut" of 54 isn't longer, or it isn't much longer. It's different in a lot of scenes. Maybe we are all used to relate a "director's cut" with "extended cut", but this isn't the case here.

reply

While it's true that the workprint's only about 20 minutes longer than the video version, close to a half hour of the video version consists of studio-enforced reshoots. In the work print, Neve Campbell had little more than a recurring silent cameo (they expanded her role when they cut the film's love triangle), the plot with Breckin Meyer's character getting caught stealing from Rubell didn't exist, etc. While some of it's the same, it's akin to the Richard Donner cut of Superman II in that it feels like an entirely different movie.

For those interested in tracking down a copy, it should be reiterated that the main copy of the work print in circulation is abysmal quality. Duped from VHS, the beginning is lopped off, there's no sound for about the first 2 minutes, the picture is dark, fuzzy, and there's a bizarre ghosting issue where the picture seems double-exposed. Weirdly, the ghosting doesn't seem present in the daylight scenes, but annoyingly the bulk of the movie takes place in the darkened club. At some point the movie was transferred to avi so it's pixely in places, and knowing ioffer bootleggers, there's doubtlessly copies that've been transferred back and forth from avi to DVD numerous times. It is watchable if you can tolerate the flaws, but only just barely.

The copy that was screened in 2008 was from a video that the director surreptitiously retained; no idea if it's the same cut as the heavily circulating print or not. I think I spent 12 years trying to find a copy, and have never succeeded in finding one that's good quality. The screen-caps popped up online soon after the 2008 screening, but I don't know of that version ever having been leaked.

reply