MovieChat Forums > 54 (1998) Discussion > The studio ruined this movie...

The studio ruined this movie...


...by 1998, the subject matter shouldn't have been considered all that shocking.

But the studio removed most of the rawer or homosexual stuff, and then beefed up Neve Campbell's role to create more of a tacked-on "hetero" romance.

It made the movie feel like an Aaron Spelling cartoon, seeming to apologize for its own subject matter and ruining it completely.

Why would the studio do this??

They apparently thought that it would be safer to turn "54" into a mall movie for 14 year old girls instead... The short-sightedness of that is that 14 year old girls were never going to flock to a film about pre-AIDS 1970s club life, even if Ryan Phillippe was the star.

So by changing the film so dramatically, it was also now unwatchable even for the portion of the audience that would have been interested in the topic.

The result: it sucked (in a bad way) and bombed.

It's a classic example of the old Hollywood axiom that when you try to please everybody (especially an imaginary audience demographic you're never going to have) you wind up pleasing nobody.

Or another axiom: Nobody knows anything, but studio executives know even less.

--

reply

I agree it was a shame this film got watered down. Glad we finally get a chance to see the infamous kiss between Ryan Phillippe and Breckin Meyer.

I hope footage showing more of Mike Myer's and Ryan Phillippe's characters' relationship would show up also. The scene where Shane sort of offers himself to Mike Myers character and he passes is so lame, so unbelievable. Really sugar-coated.

reply

The studio never pegged the success of this much altered film on Ryan Phillippe. He was as close to an unknown as possible at that time. Sure, he had completed I Know What You Did Last Summer and White Squall, but he had only a fledgling fan base and certainly hadn't been shown in the manner of this film.

Here's how he analyzed the changes in the film per an interview with Advocate Magazine four years ago: "We thought we were making something like Boogie Nights because it was about a time of complete sexual abandon, but the studio watered it down. They had Mike Myers from Austin Powers and Neve Campbell from Scream, so they felt they could make a mall movie out of material that was a lot more edgy and honest."

I've never watched the commercially released version of this film all the way through. It's just too awful. I have watched almost the entire thing via clips. It has wonderful scenes that are easier to appreciate if you just do as I do to watch them. That way you get to see what this film did so well, good acting, interesting characters, and an unflinching POV, without the annoying "cute" side plots that were inserted to tone it down. Of course the irony is that no one would blink an eye nowadays at the stuff this film's backers were afraid to show. Timing is everything.

It's not what a movie is about, it's how it is about it. RIP Roger Ebert

reply

Of course the irony is that no one would blink an eye nowadays at the stuff this film's backers were afraid to show.


Oh, no. They could still do exactly the same thing today for exactly the same idiotic reason.

Most studio executives aren't very smart people.

--

reply

Wonder if anyone will fix it...

--

The most profound of sin is tragedy unremembered.

reply