Dont tell me you wouldn't have kept the money!
I think... no... i KNOW that in the same situation i would have kept the money -4 million bucks dude!!- and imagined the same kind of plan as they came up with <keep the money somewhere safe, don't spend any dime till the story is forgotten and make sure you dont leave any trails>.
The only difference is i couldnt have killed for it. Altough the question isn't would you kill for it, rather what would you have done if you were with 2 dumbasses like Bill Paxton is in the flick and one of them kills some guy to protect the location as billy bob did. What would you do then? I mean, wouldn't you try to cover it up and make it look like an accident? Since u decided from the beginning to keep the money and your bro commits murder, which makes you an accessory to murder de facto, so yeah you'd kinda have to do what they did. Its difficult for me to imagine where i'd have drawn the line, where to stop, what's too much or not... I guess from the moment i see the guy's not dead on the snowbike, thats where the line is, you DO NOT kill him! You tell him the truth and offer him a share, even though its another loose end you'd have to deal with.
The only big flaw of Paxton's plan is being involved with 2 retarded morrons, you take them out of the equation, there might have been a happy ending out there!
So yeah, very difficult to imagine what i would have done since its easier to talk the talk, than walk the walk. I guess greed is a powerfull engine since dawn of humanity and it would definitly be my weakness too...
Wachu guys think? Where's the line? What would you have done?
Peace