how bad is this?
?
shareIt's bad, but it's a fun bad.
share
MovieChat Forums > The Peacemaker (1997) Discussion > how bad is this?
I WOULDNT CALL IT BAD...ITS WELL MADE AND ACTED...IT IS HOWEVER EXTREMLY BORING AND DULL.
shareOnly saw it once but I remember it as exactly that. Perhaps the most generic '90s action thriller I've seen yet.
shareI STAND BY THIS...ALSO...I HAVE SEEN IT TWICE...MAYBE THREE TIMES AND AT THIS POINT THE ENTIRE FILM HAS WASHED OUT OF MY MEMORY.
shareIt is not well acted. George Clooney tried to play Han Solo and failed, nobody is going to believe him as a capable military man.
The script was bad too, if Clooney were a capable military man, he would have seen many deaths before and simply brushed it off, not acting like that was his first rodeo.
Just like nobody is going to believe Nicole Kidman's role as top nuclear weapon specialist, she was too young, that was the age she just finished her PHD, and the only thing we are going to believe is that she probably slept her way to the top.
And they both are too good looking for their roles, especially Nicole Kidman, Clooney at least looked the age.
Not bad at all. A very solid and enjoyable thriller. Not sure why this one is rated so low while every other Bond-movie and Tom Clancy film adaptation from the same era is rated so high.
shareNot bad at all. Actually it's pretty good.
shareI give it a solid 7/10... maybe high 6s
It's currently at 6.0 at imdb... I recall it was at the high 5s for a while... I don't get why it's rated so low.
meh. it's the late 90s crap- Kidman looks cute.
the ending blows, literally.