Some obvious MISTAKES


FIRST OF ALL, I DID LIKE THE MOVIE, but I have 3 questions:
1 Why didn't anybody guard the elevators and stairs on the ground floor when all those agents crowded into an elevator on the way up to the terrorists room?
2 Why didn't Clooney empty his gun into the terrorist right away as he clung to the gate with the bomb strapped to his back? Remember, 100,000+ lives are close to being snuffed out. Instead they let the brother get the drop on them. Only moments before both Clooney and Kidman both were yelling at a marksman to "take the shot!" "take the shot!".
3 I guess our story might have had a pretty sad ending if the terrorist just had access to a manual override switch for the bomb. In reality there would be a switch like that, but I guess it makes for a better ending without it.
Mountain Man

reply

[deleted]

1. because it's a movie.
2. because it's a movie.
3. That wasn't really a question.

reply

I've always wondered this too. It's a movie is the most depressing answer. I like movies with realism.

reply

Then watch a realistic movie. There are plenty out there, although i think you will find they're a might more dry than a holloywood blockbuster.

reply

4) What the hell is a military officer doing waving a pistol around New York in plainclothes? Why the hell does he think he won't be shot on sight by the cops, what with the high-alert status and all?

reply

Was I the only one who noticed what looked like a Pause button (the || sign) on the bomb?

reply

[deleted]

Regarding the ending sequence:

1. They go through the trouble of stopping the airport, and all comercial air travelers (all on a hunch mind you). Yet they dont stop private planes or UN delegates.
2. How did his brother get into NY. He wasn't a delegate.
3. Ok, you've figured out he's a UN delegate. Get the closest police in there to stop him. Why must Clooney drive all the way over there to the hotel to do it himself?
4. Anybody securing the perimeter of the hotel, while we take a suspensful elevator trip upstairs?
5. If they're assuming there is no trigger connected to his heartrate.. or something like that, the sniper should have opened fire immediately. Dont worry about the civilians or little girl.. the bullet will go through them into the target.
6. Likewise, what were the police doing just stoping him there. Weren't there any orders what to do one the target is aquired? ie cuff him, or shoot him.
7. Clooney.. he shoots the guys brother instead in the stairwell.. way to prioritize there.


deltajuliet.
I'm no expert physist either, but I do believe that the trigger etc is a really complicated device like space shuttle. Small malfunction, and it wont work as its supposed to. But, nevertheless I am very very confused. The primary trigger was removed from the bomb (what he's carrying in the backpack). Its not the whole warhead. How can it go nuclear? I thought what they said earlier was that it was enough for a dirty bomb.. ie blow up radioactive material and cause panic everywhere. And thats what happened istn't it.. when she hit that knife blade into the core, a piece broke off, and then when the timer hit 0, it blew up. If it was a complete warhead, her actions would have prevented the device going critical and nuclear explosion.

So, I dont understand the "happy ending". Thanks to her, we have plutionium dust everywhere. Isn't that a bad thing?

reply

As regards the bomb, the primary is a plutonium bomb, probably only 10 kilotonnes or so ("only"). Since the SS-18 warheads are thermonuclear bombs, they have a jacket of lithium deuteride that boosts the complete device up to 500 kt. If all you want to do is blow up the UN, then a 10 kt device will do the job adequately.

Now, the way the putonium bomb works is that the explosives surrounding the core squeeze the plutonium, increasing the density to the criticality point where the chain reaction causes a nuclear explosion. The timing and configuration of the explosive lenses is critical. Get the timing off by microseconds, or the angle of the lens wrong by milliradians and the plutonium gets squeezeed unevenly and the thing won't blow. Get it wrong badly enough, and the plutonium won't even get hot enough to melt. So what Kidman's character is trying to do is disable one of the lenses or at least knock it off alignment so that when the timer reached zero, the explosives went off, but the plutonium didn't get critical. It's possible that she disabled the lens completely and the plutonium just got hammered into an odd shape by the pressure of the explosion, without even melting. So, no nuclear explosion, no radiation pulse to speak of, no vapourised plutonium, no plutonium dust.

If you want to make a dirty bomb, you need to do more than just strap radioisotopes to some HE. If the isotopes are metal, then the explosion will just knock some radioactive metal bits around, easy to trace and easy to remove. Only amateur terrorists plan to make a dirty bomb this way. If all you've got is ordinary HE, then you'll cause more damage and misery with ordinary ball-bearings and nails.

reply

As to your other points:

1. SNAFU. Somebody decided that, obviously, the lock-down didn't apply to diplomats. After all, what would diplomats be doing with a bomb?

2. Ordinary flight, wasn't it? One of the stopped ones, maybe? Obviously, you can't stop flights in the middle of the Atlantic, they have to land somewhere.

3. Dramatic necessity. The viewpoint character has to do the job, otherwise the film loses focus. In the real world, the job would get done by someone else, so it's not a great sacrifice to realism for Cloony and Kidman to do it. On the other hand, time is short, so if Clooney and Kidman are the guys with the knowledge then they should be at the sharp end so they can get any intel they need without having to spend time briefing and debriefing others.

4. There was a perimeter, but Gavrik (sp?) slipped out before it was established. Rather than show all that, the director just bypassed that entire uninteresting scene.

5. The sniper *beep* up. People do that, sometimes at the most inconvenient times. Often, in fact, that's what makes them *beep* He didn't _want_ his bullet to perforate the little girl. I can sympathise.

6. No, maybe not. They were just told to stop anyone with a backpack and search them. This was way before 9/11, remember, back when the US didn't take this stuff seriously. And they'd already stopped a dozen people before coming to Gavrik without finding anything, so they'd probably lost all enthusiasm for this game.

7. Clooney heard someone sneaking up behind him and reacted to that, as a soldier would. At that point, Gavrik might have had his hand on the deadman switch, whereas he probably wouldn't have when he was just walking down the street. And maybe it's just as difficult for Clooney's character to shoot a man in cold blood as it is for the sniper to shoot a little girl.

reply

[deleted]