I think Eastwood was a little too conservative to be a good director for this one, vis a vis inserting the romance plot and all that. I also find Eastwood tends to take things way to straight up dramatic, hit you over the head with it, in his movie, while this story needed a bit of a lighter touch and a lighter sensibility which the book had
I mostly agree that Clint's conservative posture didn't assist him in doing this material terribly well -- although I'm not sure that I agree it needed a lighter touch.
It's his worst work as a director, to be sure -- and all the more brutal a disappointment because of the promising subject matter and stature of the book.
I suspect Eastwood was itching to option the book in order to do a kind of vanity project showcasing his taste for jazz as well as Johnny Mercer's music. And while I certainly can commend that, ultimately the movie didn't work because Clint didn't really seem terribly engaged with the story or how to get the most out of its southern gothic potential.
It
sooooo missed the mark that it's almost painful. Made almost worse because you can tell what the movie wants to be as it progresses, fumbling
almost every scene as it moves along.
Even the
title scene in the garden at midnight just lays there and dies.
SMH.
--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA
reply
share