MovieChat Forums > The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) Discussion > Is Sarah supposed to be stupid, hypocrit...

Is Sarah supposed to be stupid, hypocritical, or poor writing?


Upon rewatching this move after 10 years or so, I'm very confused about the characterization of Sarah and how the writers intended her character to be portrayed. I don't know how we are "supposed" to view her character.
1. Hammond pegs her as a professional (and he knew Ellie and Grant we're professionals) and Ian is dating her, so that argues for intelligent. But Hammond also seems to be going even more off the rails, and we have no idea about Ian's tastes, so maybe she's not at the top of her field.
2. She leaves her pack lying around (you just don't leave stuff out in the open) and goes to the island by herself, which is unprofessional.
3. She touches the baby steg, even though she later gives other people a lecture about not interfering. Then again, Grant and Ellie had no qualms about touching the dinos either. So, at worst, she's a hypocrite.
4. She takes the baby t-Rex back to the trailer. This is unprofessional on so, so, so, so many different levels.
5. She talks about not sedating the baby too much because they don't know it's metabolism, don't want to kill it, etc. Except apparently that info is known. We know they did vet care in the original JP, the InGen people know how to sedate the baby, etc. I'm not saying she should have this info memorized by any means, but she observes big carnivores for a living -- she should, in theory, know what it would take to tranquilize those animals (because she wouldn't want to kill them) so it seems odd she wouldn't even brush up on that for the dinosaurs.
6. She talks about how much the t-rex can smell, and yet wears the shirt with the baby blood. And it's not like she forgets, since she even mentions it to the hunter dude.

So . . . What is she? Is she supposed to be an excited professional who is just written poorly? Or are the writers intending her to come across as dumb?

reply

I'm actually watching it for the first time right now, 30:27 in... and keep in mind I love Julianne Moore... but, holy crap Sarah is a moron!! I wanted someone to slap the hell out of her already. Wow, what an idiot!

Why do they insist on writing these awful female characters who will NOT listen to anyone (eg. a person who has experienced things first hand), who constantly do hypocritical things, and basically act like they've got the behavioral capacity and respect for their environment (and, frankly, anyone else) of a 12 year old adolescent with ADHD.

That is NOT how you write a strong woman. That is how you write an idiotic woman.

---- sig ---------
I'm neither a Liberal nor a Conservative... I think for myself.

reply

I'm actually watching it for the first time right now, 30:27 in... and keep in mind I love Julianne Moore... but, holy crap Sarah is a moron!! I wanted someone to slap the hell out of her already. Wow, what an idiot!

1. I can't understand why people visit IMDb and comment on a movie while watching it at the same time.

2. I can't understand why people come to conclusions about the characterization of a character of the main cast while they haven't even reached the middle of the film. For all they know, he/she could turn out to be the character ever by the end of the movie.


That being said, Sarah was annoying and careless. Not a professional by any means and she is also responsible (along with Nick) for most deaths in the film.


For within each death there is always a new life, a new beginning - Dillon, Alien 3

reply

I think she suffered most from being in a Spielberg film. He often makes everything else secondary to surface effect, but he really outdoes himself with this one. Here, the characters just chop and change, taking whatever shape is necessary to make the next sequence work, with very little effort towards a cohesive arc.

And the characters of Sarah and Kellie especially seem mere populist tokens; they don't seem like a lot of thought went into them.



You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

reply

Didn't Hammond say that Sarah came to him? OK he could have refused but it implies she wasn't his first choice. We also know she gets her own way, according to Hammond. He also jokes that "she thinks she's Diane Fossey" - if you really respect a naturalist you wouldn't say this about them.

Hammond had his moments but I don't think he was clueless about Sarah. And BTW:

Why do they insist on writing these awful female characters who will NOT listen to anyone... Ellie and Lex were certainly not awful, they fought (and screamed) without being obnoxious and trouble-making.

reply

I think that they didn't want to fool with the formula of the first Jurassic Park. Remember, this is based on a Michael Crichton book--and that man had a pathological distaste for creating 3 dimensional, real woman characters. He just would not let a female he could control (his characters) be anything more than anatomically-controlled. They could rise to the heights of their profession, but they'd never escape their biologically-destined role as mother, nurturer, partner to a man.

Remember how the supposedly professional scientist played by Laura Dern was practically drooling over the dinosaurs in the original? She had her estrogen levels so out-of-whack, she was mothering anything in sight--in spite of the fact she's supposedly a Ph.D. who has chosen as her life's work a career that keeps her as far from children as about any career could possibly be (scientific digs for bones of long dead critters far from civilization). Then she mothers those grandchildren of Hammond's, even carrying them around. I'd have expected her to act as tho they were space aliens--after all, where would she have encountered kids, at least since she left for college?

Juliane Moore's behavior was a chip off the old Crichton block, within seconds of meeting her on the island, she was creepily fawning over the baby dino with the adults close by, mothering a T-Rex baby, bonding with Ian's daughter--her entire role was consumed with traditionally female biological activities, hormones flowing. Women are destined to fulfill their roles as a means to reproduction and raising offspring--and if they don't give in to this urge, it warps their entire personality, and they become as the antagonist in Disclosure. Stealing the men of other women, forcing them to return affections...

So stupid, yes. Hypocritical? Only as any woman who thinks she can be anything but a mother, a nurturer, because it will come back to bite her in the butt... And poor writing? Definitely!

reply

I have often wondered if Spielberg meant for the film to be a dark comedy, because much like 'Dr Strangelove,' you got a bunch of crazy people, and people doing stupid things largely for their own personal interests.

You have so many people saying one thing, and doing the other.

Though what gets me is how Sarah seems to have that laissez-faire feel of, 'I'm one with nature, so I'm sure I'll be fully accepted by them!'

And then when she's confronted by a gigantic pair of T-Rex parents, then she decides that 'maybe they're not as happy with me as I thought.'


"Thanks, guys." "So long, partner."

- Toy Story 3 (9/10)

reply

Umm, no.

reply

Vince Vaughn's character abducted the baby Rex - everyone always seems to forget that and blame Sarah. She even tells him it was stupid to do, but I guess it's easier to blame the woman.

reply

Sarah helped bring the infant t-rex back to rv and helped care for it. It's not as if she said "no" and walked away. She was to blame also.

reply

You could see that she was incredibly stupid in one of her first scenes, when in unsettling the baby steg after her camera goes off, instead of running out of the danger area back to Ian and co. despite having ample time and space to do so, she actually runs the other way into the pack of the angry stegs. That unintentionally already suggested she wasn't quite all there in the head.

But yes, it's down to the writing. There are plenty of moments littered in this film that make characters look dumb e.g. the guy who decides to walk as far as possible to go take a pee and then gets lost, the guy who screams his lungs out when he sees the T-Rex at their camp, people not instantly running away when they see a large ship approach their dock at speed etc.

reply

Her and Nick Van Owen were idiots and got a lot of people killed

reply

I'd say all three.

reply

Sarah was a fusion of several different characters from the book. I get the impression that the screenwriters in trying to keep all the characteristics got confused. Malcolm's daughter likewise is a fusion of two characters and didn't come off very well onscreen.

reply

And the thing is Julianne Moore can actually act, heck she was nominated for an Oscar the very same year. I’m not sure what happened here but I place most of the blame on Spielberg.

reply