Yeah I think the problem with Rasputin that he was a kind of cheap rip-off on Jafar, just another slender elegant man with a beard who cackles and complains about his failures, nothing really original. His motives for trying to kill Anastasia are so ridiculous that Bartok is right in saying he should "get a life" because Anastasia didn't really do anything to him. Her family banished him and now he's so anxious to get his revenge on her; he's so anxious as though she was the one who ruined him. He also speaks of bringing a curse on the family that would destroy them, yet it was the Bolsheviks that killed the family, that's all the film elaborates on. It was the Czar's own ineffective rule that inspired hatred in the revolutionaries and brought about his abdication and later his death, a curse from Rasputin makes no significance in the family's murder. Rasputin had little to do with their deaths other than his bat minions opening the gates to let the Bolsheviks storm the palace.
This Rasputin is also nothing like the real guy who was really just a crazy monk who kept giving advice to the Romanovs that was ill-used and appeared to have visions and special powers that could help heal the youngest child Alexei through his hemophilia. To me, that kind of person is more interesting to learn about because he was a man of mystery and intrigue, some people believing he was a crazy blasphemous monk and others thinking he was a savior and a radical idealist for religion. With Don Bluth's Rasputin, he's just another evil villain who keeps cackling and complaining about killing a girl he barely knew and making very cheesy puns like "Care for a little swim under the ice" and "How enchanting, together again...for the last time!" Is that anything new for a villain because Jafar had better jokes and vocabulary than this loud-mouthed nutball.
reply
share