could this realy happen


could what they did to avoid the enemy sub work. By running silent, duck taping a light to the periscope, singing like drunk fishermen,and after they had been pinged. Could that realy work.

reply

of course, they did it in the movie didnt they? we all know that movies dont lie

reply

thanks but I was asking a real question. could that really happen?

reply

[deleted]

I hate to disappoint you but I'm in the Navy and 95% of the people on both the subs I've been on were incompetent morons. Hope you sleep well.

reply

haha!

I read your e-mail.

reply

[deleted]

I hate to disappoint you but I'm in the Navy and 95% of the people on both the subs I've been on were incompetent morons. Hope you sleep well.


I was in the Navy as well and when people make statements such as yours, I find that the other 5% are friends of those making the statements and that the commentor and his friends make up 100% of the incompetent morons that were aboard the ship in question.


I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

Thats all well and true. But the Sonar that was developed to tell you what kind of boat it is was no doubt developed within the past 30 years. The Stingray was an old WWII boat, 50 years old, desiel engine. They made strong points as to the fact that subs don't use desiel. It wasn't so much as incopetant Naval men, or inaccurate sonar, just the fact that the thought was pretty solid that Desiels were out because they were loud, and slow in comparison to others. So when they started hearing singing, and saw the lights... It was pretty obviouse that it was fisherman. Wrongly so, but the fact is that they weren't expecting it, and would expect something different (like running silent) if they did catch it.

"Cute Cat, what's it's name?"
"Annoying Customer..."

reply

wil-nun ure partially right in saying subs dont use diesel... yes US subs dont but many subs of other nations do (they actually said in movie that the fact the russkies were selling off all their diesels as well) so even tho i was a diesel engine it still woulda registered as a sub.

reply

BUT, if the sub was hunting a US sub and knew it was (as the Orlando's crew did), if they got a deisel signature on their sonar, that'd know it wasn't their target.

reply

the thing is, with sonar, you can tell the appx size of the vessel... it would have to be a damn huge boat laying quite low in the water...

reply

you would not get a "diesel" signature for a submerged diesel submarine. When submerged, the subs are 100% electric, which incidentally is nearly silent compared to nuclear submarines. It would be very difficult to find a submerged diesel submarine with passive sonar.

reply

I suspect that modern US subs have an infra-red camera in the periscope, thus could identify a submarine disguised as a surface ship.

I would prefer not to speculate on new technologies that may be used to find submerged diesels.

reply

I seem to remember a news clip about a South Korean sub outmaneuvering US subs in a joint exercise off Hawaii about 7 years ago. I won't say that it did happen, because I can't find anything to support that assertion, but I would surmise that it's a definite possibility.

reply

Nuclear subs utilize electric drive motors as well.

reply

"Nuclear subs utilize electric drive motors as well. "

Not really. The vast majority of American nuclear-powered submarines are propelled by steam- driven turbine engines that turn the shaft. While it is true that each and every SSN and SSBN in the American fleet is fitted with an electric propulsion motor, this is normally only used for emergencies (i.e. during a reactor scram to maintain forward motion of the boat), or for docking purposes when entering and leaving pierside. While there have been a couple of designs that have played with the concept of turboelectric drive, most have proven to be far too expensive, complex, and maintenance-intensive for practical fleet-wide use.

reply

The mass to length ratio of that steel hulk would NOT have come up "fishing trawler". The amount below the water line would have been easily spotted as well.

reply

stick to reading fiction. you really dont have a clue about real-world sonar

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

The question was asked: Could this really happen? And four pages of talk, suppositions, facts, and innuendo follow.

Let's change the question for a moment. If on September 9th 2001 I had asked anyone here if they thought terrorists could hijack four passenger jetliners and fly them kamikaze-style into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and the US Capitol Building — what would your answer have been?

How about the same question, three days later?

So in answer to the original question, I'm saying "Yes, it could." Maybe not exactly as shown in this movie, but given a determined group willing to operate outside of the "accepted" rules of engagement and......

BOOM!!!!

-"BB"-

reply

I too believe it is possible.

Such a decision to call a false alarm is highly likely.

However Inexperience rather than incompetence would be responsible, since many of the crew would not know any such thing as a diesel submarine exists.
I work in IT and have met people who have completed advanced diplomas in IT hardware and have never heard of a Intel 486 Processor (Model just before first Pentium around 1990)



Part fo the reason it worked/ Kelsey chose to play deversion tactics ( Carl Knox the Orlando)
he knew Carl Knox is impatient and hasty.





Who ever questioned SOnar ability this movie was made 10 years ago the sonar may have been less advanced add to that the aging Orlando (5-10 year old? they were to be replaced by new Seawolf submarines).


The Ancient stingray shown in the movie looked a hell of a lot like a ship or boat as it was, compare this to orlando modern sleek which resembling a Whale.




Carlos Powered By mozilla Firefox http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/
IExplorer is scrap

reply

Actually,this could happen. Because #1 - passive sonar only tells you how many screws (propellors) the ship (or boat, in the case of a sub) has, and how many blades. It can also tell you the approximate distance (either through direct contact, or convergance zones (donut shaped sound conduits in water), and whether or not it is a surface contact. A diesel sub is the ultimate quiet machine. Unless you catch it 'snorkling' when it runs it's diesel engines to charge it's batterys, or visually on the surface, it could very, very easily do what happened in the movie. Especially the scene mentioned in the original posters message. The advantage of nuclear subs is that they don't have to 'snorkle' (in other words, come close to the surface to recharge), and they don't have to refuel. Otherwise, a diesel sub will ALWAYS be superior in regard to quiet. A nuclear sub still has pumps running to cool the reacter. A diesel sub is using an electric motor. Which is quieter, a pump, or an electric motor?

#2 - active sonor only tells you SIZE and DISTANCE (and bearing, or course, both left/right, and up/down). They STILL use passive sonar to IDENTIFY what type of ship it is, off of it's engine sounds and the propeller sounds. The sound that is sent by active sonor does not reflect off the hull of the ship, as people believe, but actually off the AIR barrier inside the ship. (The metal hull to air barrier in most cases). The person who stated that active sonor can tell you what type of ship it is either knows of something new and top secret that is out there, or is confusing active sonor with SAR, synthetic aperature radar, which can, with SOME precision, tell you the type of ship that a surface ship is by taking multiple radar plots from different angles, comparing it to ships in it's database, and then it takes an educated guess as to the type of ship it is based on size, shape, and it's outline. (the difference between an aircraft carrier, flat with an island, or a battleship, bumpy all over with turrents, for example). HOWEVER, SAR is usually used on surveillance planes because their rapid change of bearing rate can help the computer determine the difference in radar signals. In order for sonar to do this accurately, you might as well be close enough to turn on some high powered lights and look through an underwater camera, because you can't tell much from the hull of a ship except it's size, shape, and MAYBE if it has torpedoe tubes or not (if active sonar really was this accurate). Remember, they were told they were hunting a sub. Every seen the size of a diesal sub to a nuc? It's like comparing a VW Bug to a train locomotive in size. If they weren't TOLD it was a diesel sub they were tracking, then they'd take this bait for sure.

#3) In the excercise, the diesel sub was given an advantage because the nuc captain didn't know WHAT he was chasing. If he was told he was chasing a diesel sub, then most likely, he would have caught the sub. ESPECIALLY if he knew his former XO was in charge, after all they would have know HOW each other thought.

Does anyone care for fruit..... or dessert?

reply

I suggest you all read a book titled "Scorpion in the Sea" by Peter Deutermann. It is admittedly a novel, but written by a retired Navy captain who's been there, done that and knows the drill. I won't give away too much about the plotline, but it's remarkably similar to Down Periscope . . . except that it's not a comedy and it's not an exercise.

I don't think passive sonar can tell you how many blades a propeller has, only something called "blade count" - the number of blades going by in a second (and, of course, the number of propellers turning) So a three-bladed propeller turning five revolutions per second would have a blade count of fifteen, but so would a five-bladed propeller turning three revolutions per second. Still, a given boat will have a predictable blade count and it will help identify your target.

I would say yes, it could happen. One Diesel engine running, one propeller turning, everything heard on sonar muddled by heavy weather, surface noise and shallow water; the expectation that they're hunting for an American SSN or SSBN conducting an exercise and the impatient captain Knox. But then, I'm a landlocked systems engineer, not a Navy sonar technician or a combat psychologist. I did find it curious that the sonar operator on the Orlando could hear their singing, but not their Diesel engine.

The same principles behind synthetic aperture radar and computed axial tomography - image reconstruction from numerous one-dimensional soundings - are no doubt applied to passive sonar by now, so they might get a pretty good picture.

reply

[deleted]

Yes, this CAN and DOES happen frequently. I was a radar and radio comms specialist for the Navy (12 years I did this job). What Dodge did is a very widely used practice called "Deceptive Lighting". All seagoing vessels (uncluding Navy Ships) are governed by a US Coast Guard Publication called the Navigation Rules of The Road. In this book, vessels are required to display certain colors of lights in certain positions on the ship that aid lookouts tracking them to identify generally what kind of vessel it is and what it might be doing. Using light configurations to make one kind of ship look like another kind at night or in low visibility situations is a helpful way to get warships into a hostile area without the enemy detecting them.(Remember it was early evening, and the weather was getting bad in the movie.) Also, by shutting off certain radars, and other electronic equipment, warships can make the radio energy coming away from the ship look like the transmissions of a civilian ship.....a process we call EMCON (Emissions Control). On the three ships I served on in my Navy career, deceptive lighting and EMCON were drilled and practiced constantly.
--Lord Grant me the wisdom never to judge a man until I have walked a mile in his moccasins.

reply

YES!! Thank you TexLawDog (and the previous poster)

The Blade count (like the previous poster said) is how many times a minute the blade completes a revolution,

AND, as TexasLawDog (sorry about not quoting your name perfectly) stated, there are certain things that show, ON THE SURFACE, what your ship is. FOR EXAMPLE, I don't remember the exact location, but in Tom Clancy's book 'The Cardinal in the Kremlin' (and he seems to be hauntingly accurite in his books for someone who started off as an Insurance Salesman) - the submarine USS Dallas MUST display a rotating amber light in the shoals near Denmark (I believe it was) to represent that they ARE a submarine, although they are on the surface. SO, a submarine, diesel or not, showing the INCORRECT LIGHTING of a surface ship (like a renegade sub captain, in this case, DODGE, or in case of war, the enemy) could EASILY slip past a nuc waiting for another sub.


Does anyone care for fruit..... or dessert?

reply

The light you refer to is a SID light. Submarine Identification Light. Years ago when I rode diesel boats all were required to have them. However I never saw one energized except to test it inport. And yes tricking the skimmers was part of the fun. I remember an exercize off the coast of the PI, during the night with no moon out and to prevent having to snorkel and give ourselves away during the wargame, we surfaced, ballasted down and rigged up lights on the periscope to imitate a small ship. We steamed up and done through the night in amongst the targets and submerged before daylight. The skimmers never did catch on.


*only 2 kinds of ships in the Navy, SUBMARINES and targets.

reply

A submarine on the surface is a special hazard. Like an iceberg, 90% of it is submerged. You might pass almost a hundred yards aft of the stern lamp and still collide with the rudder or screw. (I almost hate to ask how they learned that, but can guess) Consequently, the Coast Guard requires a unique signal lamp for submarines on the surface.

reply

Love your sig! :-]

reply

I've read some of the posts here and have seen a lot of speculation and truth. The Truth seems to be coming from the Navy guys and the speculation from those who aren't. I am also a submariner on a pretty old boat (699), and I just like how this movie reminds me of some of the people on my boat. I wonder how the watches can stay up that long since they have no reliefs. I know it's a movie, but they could've still made it somewhat believable. The biggest one-women on submarines! I'm not sexist or anything, but unless they revamp the interior of a submarine, it'll never happen. There just isn't space or facilities available to house both men and women on submarines. There are normally around 150-170 men on a sub. There are five heads (bathrooms) onboard.
1. Captain/XO Head- 1 shower and one toilet for 2 people
2. Chief's Head- 1 shower, 1 toilet, and 2 sinks for about 15 people
3. Officer's Head- 1 shower, 1 urinal, 1 toilet, and 1 sink for about 15 people
4. Middle Level Head- 2 showers, 1 urinal, 3 toilets, and 4 sinks for the rest of the crew (about 120- 140)
5. Lower Level Head- 1 shower, 1 toilet, and 1 toilet. Pretty much only used when the one in middle level is full or if it is the closest head.

For all of you who aren't submariners, I know this sounds disgusting and it is, but it's not the most disgusting part of being a submariner. That's just something you'll need to find out from somewhere else.

reply

Don't know about the US, but I know that at least Sweden allows women on subs on an equal level as men, and Norway was the first country to have a female submarine commander. You don't need to have different facilities for men and women, you just need crew who understand that they don't need different facilities for men and women.

reply

You also need politicians and taxpayers who understand that. So it ain't gonna happen anytime soon in the USN.

reply

Hey Jer- I wonder if you saw this article here : http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=52954

That's the link to an article entitled :Navy Policy Will Allow Women To Serve Aboard Submarines

reply


Well put TexasLawDog,
Were you an OS or an RM?

I myself was an EW and EMCON and Deceptive Lighting were my Balliwack.
Making a Cruiser look like an Aircraft Carrier was fun. and worked too.
Most often though Deceptive lighting was a trick used in FLEETEX problems but never really in real world situations.

Now for the rest of you landlubbers, EMCON was very serious and was used a lot. Radar can only tell you that there is a blip out there at range X and Direction Y. After a few sweeps of the radar you also got Course and Speed. but WHAT the blip was could NOT be found out by Radar.
You inferred what a contact was by what you knew. If it was a Low, Slow contact on the Air radar it was most likely a Civilian light plane or a Helo. If it was cruising at 35,000 ft at about .80 mach and on an air corridor it was likely a commercial airliner. Now EWs look for any radar that might be eminating from the target. Think of us as a Multimillion dollar "Fuzzbuster"
By knowig what kind of Radar is comming off the target we can tell what kind of ship, or Aircraft the target is. By shutting down certain radars we deny that information to our enemy counterpart EWs.

Sir, Put the mouse down slowly and step away from the keyboard!

reply

I was honorably discharged from the Navy in November of 2004 after 11 years 10 months and 21 days of service. I got out as an OS2(SW/AW)

--Lord Grant me the wisdom never to judge a man until I have walked a mile in his moccasins.

reply

What I liked best about this movie is that while it was a comedy, the tactics used were real tactics. Though not quite in the way shown for the most part.
Hiding under or on the same bering as a larger, noisier ship for example is a real tactic that can work. However the while "going in between the propellers" ws total bulls**t.
Deceptive lighting IS a real tactic used by the surface fleet. By altering the running lights, navigation lights, and by placing other lights around the ship you can make your ship appear as just about any other kind of ship limited only by your imagination and available supplies. Hanging square sheets over the side and backlit with white light can look like the open hanger bays of a carrier for example.

Diesel Subs are MUCH quieter than Nukes when submerged. a Nuclear Boat has to have the Reactor pumps going all the time. a Diesel sub on batteries makes almost no noise at all

The Orlando was looking for a submarine that they expected to be hiding from them. What they found was a boat on the surface using desiel engines, Lit up with a Mastheaad light and other running lights. and passive sonar picked up a bunch of rowdy singing. Just about anyone would think they found just some boat out for a cruise and NOT the Sub they were looking for.

Sir, Put the mouse down slowly and step away from the keyboard!

reply

I have a few comments regarding this thread.

First off, the singing would NOT be picked up by sonar. It is not loud enough to cause the sort of vibrations that sonar equipment would pick up. The toilet lid slamming as the sub shifts in the water would be more likely to give away a sub's position.

I also know from personal experience, that most Submarine sailors, when asked if Hunt for Red October is what the sub fleet is really like they will say no and tell the person that if they want to know what submarine life is really like to watch this movie. And trust me, it is what the US submarine fleet is like, to the T.

Yes, Sweden has many female submariners, I have met a number of them, and get the idea of the swedish bikini team out of your mind, they are normal everyday women.

Also, the last diesel boat in the US Submarine fleet was decommissioned last week.

Anyhow, I am incredibly confident in my answers due to the fact that I am married to a Submarine Sonar tech (and yes, he has a tendency to mimic different sounds that he hears, and can mimic many marine animals, it drives me nuts at times).

reply

Currently, deceptive lighting is practiced considerably by the US Coast Guard. During law enforcement operations, a cutter will often display the light configuration of a tugboat towing a barge, so that drug smugglers will see it and think "Big fat stupid barge" and not "Coast Guard cutter about to nail me."

reply

And it works too.

I joined the Navy to see the world, only to discover the world is 2/3 water!

reply

[deleted]