MovieChat Forums > Barb Wire (1996) Discussion > Why?

Why?

posted 19 years ago by sean_cowan
2 replies | jump to latest

Personally I feel that Pamela Anderson was not the best part of the movie. Infact this movie was horrible in every way. It's not that I don't like pam, however, I think that in this movie she was not very attractive. Anyways, for those of you have watched the movie, if you remember near the end of the movie some chick is tortured and electrocuted. The reason for the subject is that, I am wondering, why, and how, a chick that hot, could be an extra in a bad movie, and never be seen in a movie again. In my opinion I feel that Mary Anna Reyes (woman who got tortured) was the only redeeming part of the movie. I don't know if anyone will agree with me but I found her to be very hot. Well that's about all I have to say . Anyone agree with me that she's hot?

[–] d_cloud 18 years ago

I certainly do agree, even with her hair all static and stuff, she was still a cutie, with all those devices on the naughty places ^_^. Too bad they fried her, though. She was indeed a redeeming part of the movie (although for a moment) but the torture snene was also done to give this movie at least some plot, which it totally lacked, by giving away information to her torturers, thus the viewers :D. And Mary Anna Reyes character wasn't tortured near the end of the movie, but the brother of the Barb Wire character.

[–] their_3 18 years ago

Why US congress rules with fascistic method?