MovieChat Forums > 101 Dalmatians (1996) Discussion > Huge Laurie should of been the lead.

Huge Laurie should of been the lead.

posted 19 years ago by Ringbearer1420
11 replies | jump to latest

He shoulda.

'You don't mind if I kill all of you?'
'What? Kill me if you can!'
'It'll hurt.'

[–] dertel 19 years ago

so whats the point??? the films already been made- there is no way hugh laurie coulkd get the jiob now. and i think jeff daniels made a greatlead!!

ANATOR RENATUR

[–] dertel 19 years ago

and his name is hugh laurie not huge...or did you want to express lauries hugeness??

ANATOR RENATUR

[–] 19 years ago

[deleted]

[–] SunnyRoadToSalina 15 years ago

Jeff Daniels was a pathetic lead. I don't know what made them think he could pull it off.

[–] WarpedRecord 15 years ago

As Cruella De Vil? That would be Huge indeed!

[–] ExplorerDS6789 15 years ago

Huge Laurie? lol
Probably what the missus calls him, huh?

[–] babzey 15 years ago

This whole thread is a hilarious fail

But to back up the OP; he probably should have been, and if the film were being cast now, he probably would be. But House MD didn't exist when this movie was made .

[–] ExplorerDS6789 15 years ago

"But House MD didn't exist when this movie was made ."

This is how House worked his way through medical school: kidnapping puppies.

[–] babzey 15 years ago

I wouldn't put it past him.

[–] Concise_Statement 15 years ago

Well where the hell were you 13 years ago, Hugh Laurie Fan?

('Should have' or 'should've', NOT 'should of'.)

"And no regrets?"

[–] ian-onions 14 years ago

When writing English, we write "should have", not "should of".