MovieChat Forums > Ballykissangel (1996) Discussion > Peter and Assumpta: marriage from hell

Peter and Assumpta: marriage from hell


Peter and Assumpta would have had a marriage made in hell, i.e., roving eye marries shrew. Peter would have been reduced to pulling stout all day after having been a great priest and leader of the community. Assumpta showed her true colors in the way she degraded her husband in public -- a nice man who was devoted to her while struggling against his nature to adjust to rural life for her sake. Another beautiful woman would have walked into that pub one day soon, and the roving eye would have been up and running.

I think he would have one day returned to the priesthood and she would have gotten married multiple times, stayed at her pub and become a town character.

reply

[deleted]

Assumpta showed her true colors in the way she degraded her husband in public
Yep, I'd agree with that; though I'd have to remember that all the while she was pining for Peter Clifford - I think, but with Assumpta, how could you tell?

Oddly, Father MacAnally made their situation relevant when he directly stated that Ireland was full of Assumpta Fitzgeralds. Peter later used this pointed comment as another reason to marry Assumpta: spite. I wasn't a fan of the old coot, at least in the beginning of the series, but as it progressed, I could better understand his bygone attitude.

Part of their relationship was based on taboo, so I'm not sure how a priest without his collar would fare with a jaded woman like Assumpta, who probably also suffered much more emotionally than anyone may have guessed - I'm still curious about her back story. I think you're right, though: a prominent, priestly Peter could have a difficult time adjusting to life under the thumb of a ofttimes callous, even somewhat selfish (think of the parameters she laid down as to managing the bar to her ex, Leo) emotional lover-turned-wife. Being a bartender may not do it for him.

Objection, your Honor. You can't preface your second point with first of all.

reply

Correction: Father Mac wasn't an old coot, rather an old curmudgeon. 'Coot' just seems to flow better.

Objection, your Honor. You can't preface your second point with first of all.

reply

I got the impression that returning to the priesthood wasn't an option. Once he'd gone down that road and been laicized, there was no going bck.

But I, too, question how happy the pair would have been in the long run.

reply

He could have ended up as a professor in a university toting a folder full of notes written many years ago.

reply

Through the years, never thought much about how Peter would have fared in years to come--but it's true it might not have been smooth sailing with Assumpta. Even if we take into account that she would have been a happier and more fulfilled woman with love in her life.

One thing I found incredulous was that Peter would go rogue, leave the priesthood, then pull pints for everybody in the village without there being a bit of discomfort involved. And not just because he was a former priest--but because he was THEIR former priest!

The denizens of the village were portrayed as very nice folk (with the exception of waspish Kathleen and stuck in the mud Father Mac), but the idea of this bloke who used to hear all and every one of their "secrets" in confession now a "civilian" and working down the pub with his new missus might be very uncomfortable for these devout Catholic residents. Might they wonder if pillow talk would be shared and Peter might talk to Assumpta about them? Or even if he kept schtum, which was likely, it still might be uncomfortable for them only because he knew ALL.

The only way forward for a remotely happy future life was for Peter and Assumpta to sell up and get a pub in Dublin or....Manchester.

reply

Assumpta was a sanctimonious witch. She was the ultra liberal, leftist, secular version of Father McNally.

Peter woulda woke up one morning and ran back to Father McNally begging to come back.

reply