MovieChat Forums > Virtuosity (1995) Discussion > I found the biggest goof! You gotta to s...

I found the biggest goof! You gotta to see this!


Gotta to tell you.. I love this movie, sure it has some guilty pleasure and very similar to The Demolition Man anyways I will get to the point.

I have seen this movie so many times since I was a kid back in '95 but never noticed this.

Now, After Sid 6.7 encountered with Parker where Parker was walking around the UFC ringside, eye contacted with Sid 6.7. Freeze to 1:00:36 (1 hours, 36 seconds). What do you see? Take a wild guess! Well, I honestly don't know if anybody caught this goof but it is a topless of woman who was raising her arms up! You will see her breasts. Its very blurry but noticeable.

Yes, it's rated R but I don't know if the editors actually did this on purpose but I highly doubt it. I guess they missed it and never cut it out.


Tell me what you think.

reply

This is obviously not a mistake. Imagine that you make a film with 30 million dollars and are working with some of the best technical crew for films in the world. There are so many people on set (especially with a big budget film like this) that in production there are many sets of eyes studying the shot that is being filmed. They all know that there are bare breasts in the shot because EVERYTHING is planned in film; nothing is done by mistake and if there is a mistake, it has been noticed and left in the film because it enhances the picture.

Then there is the post process where there are assistant editors, and editor, color timers, color grading work, negative cutters and much much more. Frame by frame DVD encoders who do the transfer from DVD to film to boot. Each and every one of these people saw these breasts and they loved every frame of it.

reply

I didnt think of that...my mistake.

Just a thought!

reply

Then how do you explain the guy with his junk hanging out at the end of teen wolf? They even said they never noticed it till it was already out.

reply

Or Philip Seymour Hoffman's balls in the theatrical version of Twister?

reply

budakhan79 what about Disney's the Rescuers http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/rescuers.asp Breasts in a disney film..."EVERYTHING is planned in film"? are you sure? You seem pretty adamant about that.

Mistakes are missed quite often in films.

P.S. http://www.moviemistakes.com/best.php


adamant ... Adam Ant hmmm is that a stage name?

grrr arg

reply

[deleted]

Well of course someone put it in there, but Rescuers was definitely NOT intended to get released with nudity footage in it. The footage was obviously missed by many people, before it's release. If Disney, the director, or whomever knew about that scene, it would have been removed, Before going to theaters.

Whoever put that nude picture into the film, was very luck that he didn't get caught. I don't imagine too many people involved with making the Rescuers were happy when they found out about that scene.

In short...It was intentional to put that footage in the movie, But Not intentional to release the film that way.

grrr arg h4x0r 7Eh pl4NE7

reply

[deleted]

With that logic, all "goofs" in a movie are either planned or caught and left in before release?

Hogwash....

Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

reply

Adam adamant! http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059963/

just found this in the search for my question...just figured I'd share 'cause I'm board. (Board get it? not bored, but Board, because it's a message Board)

BTW Adam Ant's real name is Stuart Leslie Goddard. So it Is a stage name

grrr arg

reply

JUST finished reading this amusing piece of banter - nicely (an entirely unintentional, I'm sure...) played game of Word Asociation!

...and as for "grrr arg" - i c wot u did there, janX9! "Mutant Enemy" much?!?

reply

I'm so glad someone appreciated my banter thanks f00768500 and BTW good call on the Mutant Enemy signature, I don't think too many people get it.

grrr arg f00768500 ROCKS!

reply

[deleted]

the move is just on tv now. At the end when SID 6.7 throws Lt. Parker of a building the first time. you can clearly see the cable on Denzel's back. i've only just started watching at the end. it looks like Denzel Washington has forgotten to change into a costume and is still wearing his PJs

OMG it's little Kaley Cuoco

reply

herbie clearly needs to get laid badly.

reply

oh boy it gets even better. watching this on tv right now. it gets to the part herbie described and what do I see? this woman isn't hidden in the background at all, but is one of two people in the foreground of the shot, while Denzel is in the background...so you're seeing an enormous close-up of just the woman's naked chest on one side, taking up literally about half the screen.


there is zero chance of you missing it and there is not even the tiniest possibility of the filmmakers not having seen it. I have no idea how anyone could possibly mistake this for an unseen "goof".

/thread.

reply

I noticed that when I was younger and the movie first came out on HBO. LOL. Can't keep a pair of titties away from me at that age. I could've seen tits if they were in orbit! HAHAHAHA

reply

No It wasnt intentional that I would see it very closer. I have seen this movie about 10 times in my lifetime and havent noticed it until the last time I saw that part. I mean the camera was just moving around the ringcage and it was blurry in the background that you don't catch it.

I dont think it is a goof now as I stated it before when I made a topic about it.

reply

[deleted]

All those film professionals didnt catch this kid in "Back to the Future 3" pointing to his junk...lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq5-6PkVGCg

reply

A little kid in the background pointing one little bitty finger at his fully clothed crotch is hardly comparable to a topless grown woman featured prominently in a scene. The topless woman is clearly deliberate. Some women at rock concerts and other wild events like the one SID 6.7 was at sometimes get carried away and take their tops off. The topless shot was in there to add to the wild atmosphere.

I do not have attention deficit disor...Ooh, look at the bunny!

reply

We need youtube video of the woman
Plus her name!

reply

No, it very clearly was intentional and not even slightly blurry or obscured like you describe. It was so blatantly intentional that I have a hard time believing that you actually believe the crap you're saying.

reply

Maybe it was just an exhibitionist extra, but whether they planned it or not it was clearly consciously included after the fact.

Kentoc'h mervel eget bezañ saotret

reply

[deleted]

Gee willikens! A film made in the 1990s where a woman's (gasp!) breasts were shown!

Is it something to do with being American? Are you offended by the sight of a woman breastfeeding? Do you ring up TV stations to complain if you see a woman's nipple in a TV show? Have you got over Janet Jackson yet?

reply

I saw this on HBO when it came out. I was 9. The boobs are the first thing I think of whenever this movie gets brought up.

It doesn't get brought up often, but that's not the point. There was also a special effects show that featured the scene of SWAT shooting out all the windows. It might have been Movie Magic. *HINT* It was fake glass placed in front of the real glass, and it was rigged to break.

reply

I can't see where it is... someone can post a picture of this??

reply

it's at 1 hour 39 seconds to 1 hour 40 seconds. Slow down the video. You'll see a topless woman with blurry boobs but it's all there. I was focused on denzel aiming i didn't even notice it the first 3 times LOL.

reply

Star Wars Return of the JEDI - Infamous clip of the dancers boob slip before she falls down the trap door before her demise with the rancor - happens all the time

reply